Glaser W R, Düngelhoff F J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):640-54. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.640.
If a word is printed inside the outline drawing of a concrete object, interference patterns as in Stroop research are obtained under the instruction to name the picture or to read the word. Smith and Magee (1980) have shown that these patterns change fundamentally if the naming or reading task is replaced by a categorizing task. Their results seem to corroborate the relative speed hypothesis, which explains Stroop-like interferences by faster processing of the distractor than the target. Two experiments are reported here in which the time course of picture-word interferences was analyzed by a systematically varied stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of the two stimulus components in the picture-naming, word-reading, picture-categorizing, and word-categorizing tasks. The results argue against the relative speed hypothesis and suggest a functional internal processing asymmetry between inhibition-immune recoding, effective in word reading and picture categorizing, and inhibition-susceptible recoding in picture naming and word categorizing.
如果一个单词印在具体物体的轮廓图内,那么在命名图片或阅读单词的指令下,会得到类似于斯特鲁普研究中的干扰模式。史密斯和马吉(1980)已经表明,如果命名或阅读任务被分类任务所取代,这些模式会发生根本性的变化。他们的结果似乎证实了相对速度假说,该假说通过干扰物比目标物更快的加工来解释类似斯特鲁普的干扰。本文报告了两个实验,其中通过在图片命名、单词阅读、图片分类和单词分类任务中系统地改变两个刺激成分的刺激开始异步性(SOA),来分析图片-单词干扰的时间进程。结果与相对速度假说相悖,并表明在单词阅读和图片分类中有效的抑制免疫重新编码与图片命名和单词分类中易受抑制的重新编码之间存在功能性的内部加工不对称。