Suppr超能文献

[跟腱断裂。手术治疗与非手术治疗结果的比较]

[Ruptures of the Achilles tendon. Comparison of the results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment].

作者信息

Kouvalchouk J F, Rodineau J, Watin Augouard L

出版信息

Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1984;70(6):473-8.

PMID:6239331
Abstract

The authors have compared the results obtained in 76 cases of rupture of the tendo Achillis treated conservatively with a previously published series of cases treated surgically. The same assessment of the results was used. The main complication of surgical treatment was skin necrosis; the main complication of conservative treatment was recurrent rupture. To objective assessment, the loss of strength in the triceps surae was about 20 p. 100 in both series. Subjectively, the conservatively-treated patients seemed more satisfied. These findings support the conclusions of other published comparative studies that conservative treatment is worthwhile since it avoids general anaesthesia and hospital treatment. It is indicated when the conditions are favourable. Surgical treatment should be used in young athletes because healing is quicker in cases of recurrent rupture or old ruptures.

摘要

作者将76例保守治疗的跟腱断裂病例的结果与先前发表的一系列手术治疗病例的结果进行了比较。采用了相同的结果评估方法。手术治疗的主要并发症是皮肤坏死;保守治疗的主要并发症是复发性断裂。客观评估显示,两个系列中腓肠肌三头肌的力量损失约为20%。主观上,保守治疗的患者似乎更满意。这些发现支持了其他已发表的比较研究的结论,即保守治疗是值得的,因为它避免了全身麻醉和住院治疗。在条件有利时适用。对于年轻运动员应采用手术治疗,因为复发性断裂或陈旧性断裂病例愈合更快。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验