• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部用美他环素、红霉素和安慰剂治疗丘疹脓疱型痤疮的双盲组间比较

[Double-blind group comparison of topical meclocycline, erythromycin and placebo in the treatment of papulo-pustulosa acne].

作者信息

Rozman T A, Klövekorn G, Kompa H

出版信息

Z Hautkr. 1984 Dec 1;59(23):1623-34.

PMID:6240840
Abstract

Ten institutions participated in a controlled clinical trial in order to evaluate the efficacy of topical meclocycline and erythromycin in comparison to placebo with regard to papulopustular acne. Both drugs had been incorporated in the same galenic formulation that served as placebo. The vehicle employed in this study guaranteed equally favorable drug relies for both preparations. At the end of the trial, 419 patients could be evaluated for efficacy. As impartial criterion for evaluation, the number of inflammatory lesions on the right side of the face was counted before and after three months of treatment. In addition, we recorded the patients' and physicians' overall judgment at the end of the study. As compared with placebo, meclocycline as well as erythromycin brought about statistically significant improvement already after two months of treatment. After three months, the results were statistically very highly significant (p less than 0.001). At any time of the study, there could not be demonstrated any difference between the two groups treated with meclocycline and erythromycin.

摘要

十家机构参与了一项对照临床试验,以评估局部应用甲氯环素和红霉素与安慰剂相比治疗丘疹脓疱型痤疮的疗效。两种药物均被制成与安慰剂相同的剂型。本研究中使用的赋形剂确保了两种制剂的药物依赖情况同样良好。试验结束时,419名患者可进行疗效评估。作为公正的评估标准,在治疗三个月前后对右侧面部的炎性皮损数量进行计数。此外,我们在研究结束时记录了患者和医生的总体判断。与安慰剂相比,甲氯环素和红霉素在治疗两个月后就已带来具有统计学意义的改善。三个月后,结果具有统计学高度显著性(p小于0.001)。在研究的任何时候,接受甲氯环素和红霉素治疗的两组之间均未显示出任何差异。

相似文献

1
[Double-blind group comparison of topical meclocycline, erythromycin and placebo in the treatment of papulo-pustulosa acne].局部用美他环素、红霉素和安慰剂治疗丘疹脓疱型痤疮的双盲组间比较
Z Hautkr. 1984 Dec 1;59(23):1623-34.
2
A topical azithromycin preparation for the treatment of acne vulgaris and rosacea.一种用于治疗寻常痤疮和酒渣鼻的局部用阿奇霉素制剂。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2004 Sep;15(5):295-302. doi: 10.1080/09546630410033808.
3
Meclosorb, a new topical antibiotic agent in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a double-blind clinical study.
Acta Derm Venereol. 1984;64(4):354-7.
4
[A new salt of erythromycin (A-137 or erythromycin lauryl sulfate) in the topical treatment of acne].[一种新的红霉素盐(A-137或硫酸月桂基红霉素)在痤疮局部治疗中的应用]
Med Cutan Ibero Lat Am. 1982;10(3):151-8.
5
Clinical evaluation of Double Strength Isotrexin versus Benzamycin in the topical treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris.双效异维甲酸与苄星霉素局部治疗轻至中度寻常痤疮的临床评估
J Dermatolog Treat. 2002 Sep;13(3):111-7. doi: 10.1080/09546630260199460.
6
Meclocycline sulfosalicylate. Topical antibiotic agent for the treatment of acne vulgaris.磺基水杨酸甲氯环素。用于治疗寻常痤疮的外用抗生素制剂。
Cutis. 1981 Feb;27(2):203-4, 208-10.
7
Clinical and bacteriological evaluation of nadifloxacin 1% cream in patients with acne vulgaris: a double-blind, phase III comparison study versus erythromycin 2% cream.1%那氟沙星乳膏治疗寻常痤疮患者的临床及细菌学评价:一项与2%红霉素乳膏对比的双盲III期研究
Eur J Dermatol. 2006 Jan-Feb;16(1):48-55.
8
[Clinical evaluation of a topical ethyl lactate treatment of acne vulgaris (author's transl)].外用乳酸乙酯治疗寻常痤疮的临床评估(作者译)
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1978 Oct;105(10):833-8.
9
Tretinoin gel microspheres 0.04% versus 0.1% in adolescents and adults with mild to moderate acne vulgaris: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase IV trial.0.04%与0.1%维甲酸凝胶微球治疗青少年和成人轻至中度寻常痤疮的12周多中心随机双盲平行组IV期试验
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1086-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.021.
10
Clinical evaluation of a new erythromycin solution for acne vulgaris.一种治疗寻常痤疮的新型红霉素溶液的临床评估。
Cutis. 1980 May;25(5):552-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication.服用大环内酯类抗生素与服用安慰剂的人群因任何适应症出现的不良事件。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1(1):CD011825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011825.pub2.