Vasseur P B, Paul H A, Dybdal N, Crumley L
Am J Vet Res. 1984 Nov;45(11):2385-8.
The influence of lidocaine and bupivacaine on the breaking strength and histopathologic appearance of wounds in the ventral abdominal midline (linea alba) of rabbits was studied. In control rabbits, group 1 (n = 24), skin and subcutaneous tissues were incised, permitting direct infiltration of the linea alba with normal saline solution. The linea alba was then incised, and wound margins were apposed in layers, using absorbable suture material. Group 2 rabbits (n = 24) were given 0.5% lidocaine, group 3 rabbits (n = 24) were given 2% lidocaine, and group 4 rabbits (n = 24) were given 0.5% bupivacaine, rather than saline solution. Eight rabbits from each group were killed 6, 12, and 18 days after wounding. Eight 1.0-cm wide transverse strips were removed from the abdominal wall of each rabbit. Two strips were used for histopathologic evaluation and 6 were tested for failure, using a mechanical testing device. Breaking strengths in group 1 averaged 0.66 kg, 1.35 kg, and 1.57 kg at 6, 12, and 18 days, respectively. None of the test groups had significantly different (P greater than 0.05) breaking strength results as compared with that in controls. The histopathologic appearance of tissues infiltrated with local anesthetics did not vary consistently from that of tissues infiltrated with normal saline solution. Local infiltration of lidocaine and bupivacaine does not alter substantially the healing of midline abdominal incisions in rabbits.
研究了利多卡因和布比卡因对兔腹正中白线伤口抗张强度和组织病理学表现的影响。在第1组(n = 24)对照兔中,切开皮肤和皮下组织,使生理盐水直接浸润白线。然后切开白线,使用可吸收缝合材料分层对合伤口边缘。第2组(n = 24)兔给予0.5%利多卡因,第3组(n = 24)兔给予2%利多卡因,第4组(n = 24)兔给予0.5%布比卡因,而不是生理盐水。每组8只兔在受伤后6、12和18天处死。从每只兔的腹壁取下8条1.0厘米宽的横向条带。2条用于组织病理学评估,6条用机械测试装置进行抗张强度测试。第1组在6、12和18天时的抗张强度平均分别为0.66千克、1.35千克和1.57千克。与对照组相比,各试验组的抗张强度结果均无显著差异(P大于0.05)。用局部麻醉药浸润的组织的组织病理学表现与用生理盐水浸润的组织的表现并无一致的差异。利多卡因和布比卡因的局部浸润对兔腹部正中切口的愈合没有实质性影响。