Suppr超能文献

使用两种缝合方式对美洲驼白线强度进行的体外生物力学比较。

In vitro biomechanical comparison of the strength of the linea alba of the llama, using two suture patterns.

作者信息

Van Hoogmoed L, Snyder J R, Stover S M, Drake C, Taylor K, Harmon F A, McDuffee L

机构信息

Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.

出版信息

Am J Vet Res. 1996 Jun;57(6):938-42.

PMID:8725826
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the strength of the sutured linea alba, in vitro, using 2 suture patterns.

ANIMALS

12 clinically normal llamas.

PROCEDURE

2 incisions in the linea alba of 12 llamas were closed with a simple continuous or inverted cruciate pattern, and tissue was harvested after 10 days. In 6 llamas the simple continuous line was intact; the inverted cruciate specimens contained 6 sutures. In 6 llamas, 1 knot was excised in the simple continuous pattern to simulate a failed line; the cruciate pattern contained 5 knots. Tissue sections were taken from cranial, between, and caudal to the linea alba incisions to compare fascial thickness. The sutured specimens were mounted in a mechanical testing system and tested to failure. A mixed-model ANOVA was used to evaluate the effects of suture pattern and incisional position on mechanical properties.

RESULTS

Significant differences were not found between suture patterns or between location for yield force, failure force, or yield strain, whereas failure strain was lower for the intact simple continuous pattern than the inverted cruciate pattern (P = 0.003). From histomorphometric analysis, the caudal tissue specimens were significantly thinner than the middle tissue specimen cranial to the umbilicus (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in monotonic breaking strength of the linea alba sutured with the simple continuous or inverted cruciate pattern.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results justify the use of the simple continuous pattern over the cruciate pattern for ventral midline closure in llamas because of the ease of placement and speed.

摘要

目的

在体外比较两种缝合方式对白线的缝合强度。

动物

12只临床健康的美洲驼。

方法

在12只美洲驼的白线上做两个切口,分别用单纯连续缝合法或倒“十”字缝合法进行缝合,10天后采集组织。6只美洲驼的单纯连续缝线保持完整;倒“十”字缝合法的标本包含6根缝线。另6只美洲驼,在单纯连续缝合法中切除1个线结以模拟缝线失效;倒“十”字缝合法包含5个线结。从白线切口的头侧、中间和尾侧取组织切片以比较筋膜厚度。将缝合后的标本安装在机械测试系统中进行破坏试验。采用混合模型方差分析来评估缝合方式和切口位置对力学性能的影响。

结果

在屈服力、破坏力或屈服应变方面,缝合方式之间或位置之间均未发现显著差异,而完整的单纯连续缝合法的破坏应变低于倒“十”字缝合法(P = 0.003)。组织形态计量学分析显示,尾侧组织标本明显比脐部头侧的中间组织标本薄(P = 0.006)。

结论

单纯连续缝合法和倒“十”字缝合法缝合白线的单调断裂强度无显著差异。

临床意义

由于操作简便且速度快,这些结果证明在美洲驼腹中线闭合中使用单纯连续缝合法优于倒“十”字缝合法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验