Suppr超能文献

来自主动脉体和颈动脉体的化学感受器传入神经反应的相对潜伏期。

Relative latency of responses of chemoreceptor afferents from aortic and carotid bodies.

作者信息

Lahiri S, Nishino T, Mulligan E, Mokashi A

出版信息

J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Feb;48(2):362-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.2.362.

Abstract

Discharges from aortic and carotid body chemoreceptor afferents were simultaneously recorded in 18 anesthetized cats to test the hypothesis that aortic chemoreceptors, because of their proximity to the heart, respond to changes in arterial blood gases before carotid chemoreceptors. We found that carotid chemoreceptor responses to the onset of hypoxia and hypercapnia, and to the intravenously administered excitatory drugs (cyanide, nicotine, and doxapram), preceded those of aortic chemoreceptors. Postulating that this unexpected result was due to differences in microcirculation and mass transport, we also investigated their relative speed of responses to changes in arterial blood pressure. The aortic chemoreceptors responded to decreases in arterial blood pressure before the carotid chemoreceptors, supporting the idea that the aortic body has microcirculatory impediments not generally present in the carotid body. These findings strengthened the concept that carotid bodies are more suited for monitoring blood gas changes due to respiration, whereas aortic bodies are for monitoring circulation.

摘要

在18只麻醉猫身上同时记录主动脉体和颈动脉体化学感受器传入神经的放电,以检验以下假设:由于主动脉化学感受器靠近心脏,它们比颈动脉化学感受器更早对动脉血气变化作出反应。我们发现,颈动脉化学感受器对低氧和高碳酸血症发作以及静脉注射兴奋性药物(氰化物、尼古丁和多沙普仑)的反应比主动脉化学感受器更早。鉴于这一意外结果是由于微循环和物质运输的差异所致,我们还研究了它们对动脉血压变化的相对反应速度。主动脉化学感受器比颈动脉化学感受器更早对动脉血压下降作出反应,这支持了主动脉体存在颈动脉体通常不存在的微循环障碍这一观点。这些发现强化了这样一个概念,即颈动脉体更适合监测呼吸引起的血气变化,而主动脉体则用于监测循环。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验