Rosan B, Malamud D, Appelbaum B, Golub E
Infect Immun. 1982 Jan;35(1):86-90. doi: 10.1128/iai.35.1.86-90.1982.
Comparison of saliva-mediated aggregation of Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus mutans and adhesion of these organisms to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite showed that there was no relationship between these two activities. Adsorption of salivary aggregating activity to bacteria appears to have little effect on the ability of the residual saliva to support adherence; conversely, adsorption of salivary adherence factors to hydroxyapatite does not affect aggregation. Although heating saliva significantly reduces bacterial aggregation, it has little or no effect on adherence. A comparison of aggregation and adhesion with serial dilutions of saliva demonstrated that adhesion could still be detected at 100 to 500-fold-lower concentrations of salivary protein that bacterial aggregation. These findings support the concept that aggregation and adherence involve two distinct mechanisms of microbial clearance in the oral cavity.
对血链球菌、缓症链球菌和变形链球菌的唾液介导聚集以及这些微生物对唾液包被羟基磷灰石的黏附进行比较,结果表明这两种活性之间没有关系。唾液聚集活性吸附到细菌上似乎对残余唾液支持黏附的能力影响很小;相反,唾液黏附因子吸附到羟基磷灰石上并不影响聚集。虽然加热唾液会显著降低细菌聚集,但对黏附几乎没有影响。用唾液系列稀释液对聚集和黏附进行比较表明,在唾液蛋白浓度比细菌聚集低100至500倍时仍能检测到黏附。这些发现支持了这样一种概念,即聚集和黏附涉及口腔中微生物清除的两种不同机制。