Sharpe R T, Langley A M, Mowat G N, Macaskill J A, Holmes P H
Res Vet Sci. 1982 May;32(3):289-93.
The primary and secondary antibody responses to foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine were examined in cattle infected with Trypanosoma congolense and the response of some of these animals to live foot-and-mouth disease virus challenge was assessed. Infected groups of cattle had rather lower antibody responses than uninfected control cattle after primary vaccination but the antibody titres were not significantly depressed until after secondary vaccination. These levels remained depressed for the duration of the experiment, ie, 183 days. Trypanocidal therapy with diminazene aceturate of infected cattle at the time of vaccination did not significantly improve the antibody response to primary vaccination. Their subsequent response to live virus challenge was somewhat equivocal in that the number of animals protected was not significantly different in comparison to the untreated infected and uninfected controls. It was concluded that trypanosome-infected cattle do not produce optimal responses to foot-and-mouth disease vaccination. Nevertheless, the antibody titres are generally above those considered adequate to confer 95 per cent protection against needle challenge.
对感染刚果锥虫的牛群进行了针对口蹄疫病毒疫苗的初次和二次抗体反应检测,并评估了其中一些动物对活口蹄疫病毒攻击的反应。在初次接种疫苗后,感染牛群的抗体反应比未感染的对照牛群略低,但直到二次接种后抗体滴度才显著降低。在实验持续的183天内,这些水平一直处于较低状态。在接种疫苗时用乙酰氨基阿维菌素对感染牛进行杀锥虫治疗,并未显著改善对初次接种疫苗的抗体反应。它们随后对活病毒攻击的反应有些模糊,因为与未治疗的感染和未感染对照相比,受到保护的动物数量没有显著差异。得出的结论是,感染锥虫的牛对口蹄疫疫苗接种不会产生最佳反应。然而,抗体滴度通常高于被认为足以提供95%针对针刺攻击保护的水平。