Donati F, Ferguson A, Bevan D R
Anesth Analg. 1983 Mar;62(3):314-6.
During N2O-O2-halothane anesthesia pancuronium (3 mg/70 kg) was antagonized with neostigmine (2.5 or 5 mg/70 kg), pyridostigmine (10 or 20 mg/70 kg), or edrophonium (50 or 100 mg/70 kg) in 36 human subjects (6 in each group). Reversal was attempted at 10% spontaneous recovery of muscle twitch, which was measured using train-of-four stimulation. When first twitch tension was less than 70% of the control it was found that for the same tension, the train-of-four ratio was greater with edrophonium than with neostigmine, and greater with neostigmine than with pyridostigmine. It was concluded that the three antagonists have different mechanisms of action. In comparison with neostigmine, edrophonium is more and pyridostigmine is less effective at presynaptic (or fade) receptors.
在36名受试者(每组6人)中,于氧化亚氮-氧气-氟烷麻醉期间,用新斯的明(2.5或5mg/70kg)、吡啶斯的明(10或20mg/70kg)或依酚氯铵(50或100mg/70kg)拮抗泮库溴铵(3mg/70kg)。当肌肉抽搐自发恢复至10%时尝试进行逆转,肌肉抽搐采用四个成串刺激进行测量。当首次抽搐张力低于对照值的70%时,发现在相同张力下,依酚氯铵的四个成串刺激比值大于新斯的明,新斯的明的四个成串刺激比值大于吡啶斯的明。得出的结论是,这三种拮抗剂具有不同的作用机制。与新斯的明相比,依酚氯铵对突触前(或衰减)受体的作用更强,而吡啶斯的明对突触前(或衰减)受体的作用较弱。