Pedersen N C, Black J W
Am J Vet Res. 1983 Feb;44(2):229-34.
Kittens vaccinated with an avirulent biotype of the Black strain of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV; given oronasally) developed both indirect fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies, but were not protected against oronasal challenge exposure with virulent virus. In fact, kittens vaccinated with avirulent virus were more readily infected than were nonvaccinated cats. A proportion of kittens could be immunized to FIPV by giving sublethal amounts of virulent virus. This technique, however, was too inconsistent and hazardous to have clinical relevance. The results of these studies indicated that humoral immunity was not protective in FIPV infection. There was no correlation between fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies and either disease or immunity. Immune serum from FIPV-resistant cats failed to passively protect susceptible animals against virulent virus given intraperitoneally or oronasally, and as expected, actually sensitized them to infection. It was concluded that cell-mediated immunity was probably responsible for protection.
用猫传染性腹膜炎病毒(FIPV)黑毒株的无毒力生物型经口接种疫苗的小猫产生了间接荧光抗体和病毒中和抗体,但未受到强毒病毒经口攻击暴露的保护。事实上,接种无毒力病毒的小猫比未接种疫苗的猫更容易感染。通过给予亚致死量的强毒病毒,一部分小猫可以对FIPV产生免疫。然而,这项技术太不稳定且有风险,不具有临床相关性。这些研究结果表明,体液免疫在FIPV感染中没有保护作用。荧光抗体和病毒中和抗体与疾病或免疫之间没有相关性。来自抗FIPV猫的免疫血清不能被动保护易感动物免受经腹腔或经口给予的强毒病毒的侵害,并且正如预期的那样,实际上使它们对感染更加敏感。得出的结论是,细胞介导的免疫可能是起到保护作用的原因。