Marre R, Herhahn D, Schulz E, Freiesleben H, Sack K
Infection. 1983;11 Suppl 1:S54-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01641108.
The therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of the cephalosporins ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, cefotaxime and HR 221 were studied in animal experiments. The animal model used was experimental estrogen-induced or non-induced chronic Escherichia coli pyelonephritis in rats. The animals were treated with 5 mg cephalosporin/kg twice daily for one week. Each of the cephalosporins tested led to a significant decrease in renal bacterial counts, in spite of the low doses given. Ceftazidime was significantly more active than HR 221 in both experimental models, although the serum levels of HR 221 were higher and were maintained for a longer period of time than those of ceftazidime. Differences in pharmacokinetic properties (influenced by metabolic stability and protein binding) could be the reason for the differences in therapeutic activity, since the in vitro antimicrobial activity of each of the cephalosporins tested was very similar against the test strain.
在动物实验中研究了头孢他啶、头孢唑肟、头孢噻肟和HR 221这几种头孢菌素的治疗效果和药代动力学。所使用的动物模型是实验性雌激素诱导或非诱导的大鼠慢性大肠杆菌肾盂肾炎。动物每天两次接受5毫克/千克头孢菌素治疗,持续一周。尽管给予的剂量较低,但所测试的每种头孢菌素都使肾脏细菌数量显著减少。在两种实验模型中,头孢他啶的活性均显著高于HR 221,尽管HR 221的血清水平更高,且维持时间比头孢他啶更长。药代动力学特性的差异(受代谢稳定性和蛋白质结合影响)可能是治疗活性差异的原因,因为所测试的每种头孢菌素对测试菌株的体外抗菌活性非常相似。