Vincent H F, Hatem J M, Upshur J, Sade R M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Jul;86(1):150-3.
The suitability of absorbable suture for atrial repair was tested in 25 rabbits in which atrial wounds were repaired with either polyglycolic acid or polypropylene suture. Tensile strength and wound thickness were measured at several time intervals up to 8 weeks after wounding. With each animal used as its own control, the ratio of wound tensile strength to that of unwounded atrium and of wound thickness to thickness of unwounded atrium were compared at several time intervals. There was no difference between polyglycolic acid and polypropylene suture lines in tensile strength index, but the wall thickness index was significantly lower for polyglycolic acid sutures. The latter finding was probably due to a less intense chronic inflammatory response in the polyglycolic acid group. Because of the necessity for maximal size and future growth of atrial anastomoses after repair of some congenital cardiac malformations, polyglycolic acid suture appears to be a reasonable alternative to nonabsorbable suture for atrial repair in children.
在25只兔子身上测试了可吸收缝线用于心房修复的适用性,这些兔子的心房伤口分别用聚乙醇酸或聚丙烯缝线进行修复。在受伤后长达8周的几个时间间隔测量拉伸强度和伤口厚度。以每只动物自身作为对照,在几个时间间隔比较伤口拉伸强度与未受伤心房拉伸强度的比值以及伤口厚度与未受伤心房厚度的比值。聚乙醇酸和聚丙烯缝线组在拉伸强度指数方面没有差异,但聚乙醇酸缝线的壁厚指数显著更低。后一发现可能是由于聚乙醇酸组慢性炎症反应不那么强烈。由于修复某些先天性心脏畸形后心房吻合口需要最大尺寸和未来生长,聚乙醇酸缝线似乎是儿童心房修复中不可吸收缝线的合理替代品。