Suppr超能文献

头孢替安(CGP/14221)与头孢噻吩治疗尿路感染的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of cefotiam (CGP/14221) versus cephalothin in the treatment of urinary tract infections.

作者信息

Tselentis J, Cordossis T, Eliopoulos G

出版信息

Pharmatherapeutica. 1983;3(6):382-7.

PMID:6312460
Abstract

A study was carried out in 35 patients with urinary tract infections to compare the efficacy and tolerance of cefotiam and cephalothin. Patients received at random either 1 g cefotiam twice daily (19 patients) or 1 g cephalothin 4-times daily (16 patients) parenterally over a period of 10 days. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed mainly on disappearance of bacteriuria. Only 1 patient of those receiving cefotiam failed to respond and suffered a delayed relapse. Five patients failed to respond to cephalothin: in 3 of them bacteriuria persisted throughout treatment and there was relapse in the other 2 patients. The time for the disappearance of bacteriuria was significantly shorter in the cefotiam group.

摘要

对35例尿路感染患者进行了一项研究,以比较头孢替安和头孢噻吩的疗效及耐受性。患者随机接受以下治疗:19例患者每日两次静脉注射1g头孢替安,共10天;16例患者每日4次静脉注射1g头孢噻吩,共10天。主要根据菌尿消失情况评估治疗效果。接受头孢替安治疗的患者中只有1例无反应并出现延迟复发。5例患者对头孢噻吩无反应:其中3例在整个治疗过程中菌尿持续存在,另外2例出现复发。头孢替安组菌尿消失时间明显更短。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验