Suppr超能文献

双氯芬酸片与布洛芬胶囊治疗炎性风湿病的双盲对照研究

[Double-blind comparative study of Bi-Profenid tablets and Profenid capsules in inflammatory rheumatism].

作者信息

Camus J P, Fournie A, Ayrolles C, Koeger A C, Prier A

出版信息

Sem Hop. 1983 Dec 12;59(46):3221-4.

PMID:6318346
Abstract

The effectiveness of Bi-Profenid tablets and Profenid capsules was studied comparatively in patients with inflammatory joint disease. 43 patients with rheumatoid arthritis or various chronic inflammatory joint diseases were given 300 mg of Bi-Profenid in 2 daily oral doses and 300 mg of Profenid in 3 daily oral doses, for two consecutive 7 day periods. This double blind cross-over study was carried out in two rheumatology centers. Effectiveness of the two forms of ketoprofen on morning stiffness and pain scale was found to be comparable. However, patients more often preferred Bi-Profenid (15 cases) to Profenid (10 cases); 12 patients reported no difference. Tolerance was excellent in 92.7% of cases under Profenid capsules and in 94.8% of cases under Bi-Profenid tablets.

摘要

对患有炎性关节疾病的患者,比较了双氯芬酸片和酮洛芬胶囊的疗效。43例类风湿性关节炎或各种慢性炎性关节疾病患者,连续两个7天期间,每日分2次口服给予300mg双氯芬酸,每日分3次口服给予300mg酮洛芬。这项双盲交叉研究在两个风湿病中心进行。发现两种酮洛芬剂型对晨僵和疼痛量表的疗效相当。然而,与酮洛芬(10例)相比,更多患者(15例)更喜欢双氯芬酸;12例患者表示无差异。服用酮洛芬胶囊的患者中92.7%耐受性良好,服用双氯芬酸片的患者中94.8%耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验