Suppr超能文献

[酮洛芬对胃十二指肠黏膜的不良反应。两种口服剂型的比较]

[Adverse effects of ketoprofen on the gastroduodenal mucosa. Comparison of the 2 oral forms].

作者信息

Barthélémy C

出版信息

Sem Hop. 1983 Dec 12;59(46):3258-60.

PMID:6318355
Abstract

Twenty healthy volunteers were entered into a double-blind study designed to compare the digestive tolerance, evaluated by fiberoptic gastroscopy, of Profenid capsules and Bi-Profenid tablets. Ten subjects were given 6 Profenid 50 mg capsules daily and the remaining ten were given 2 Bi-Profenid 150 mg tablets daily. Each drug was given for seven days. Fiberoptic gastroscopy was done before and after treatment with the use of a scoring system. A better score was obtained with the tablets as compared to the capsules. While the incidence of lesions found in the antrum and bulb did not differ between the two forms, lesions of the fundus were less frequent with Bi-Profenid 150 mg. This reflects a reduction in the contact effects of Bi-Profenid on the gastric mucosa, while the systemic effect of ketoprofen remains unchanged.

摘要

20名健康志愿者参与了一项双盲研究,该研究旨在通过纤维胃镜检查比较布洛芬胶囊和双布洛芬片的消化耐受性。10名受试者每天服用6粒50毫克的布洛芬胶囊,其余10名受试者每天服用2片150毫克的双布洛芬片。每种药物服用7天。使用评分系统在治疗前后进行纤维胃镜检查。与胶囊相比,片剂的得分更高。虽然两种剂型在胃窦和胃体发现的病变发生率没有差异,但150毫克双布洛芬片引起的胃底病变较少。这反映了双布洛芬对胃黏膜的接触效应降低,而酮洛芬的全身效应保持不变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验