• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验室数据站:一个用于以标准单位报告临床实验室数据的计算机化系统。

Labstand: a computerized system for reporting clinical laboratory data in standard units.

作者信息

Parkerson G R

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1978 Mar;6(3):611-20.

PMID:632773
Abstract

A computerized system, Labstand, is described which was developed to simplify the presentation of laboratory data for the clinician. It converts data into standard units (su) on a scale of 0 to 100, identical for all tests. Conversions are based on both normal and abnormal ranges, determined from clinical experience, to allow both immediate recognition of abnormality and estimation of the degree of abnormality. This paper reports the findings of a study using this system which involved 1,412 abnormal laboratory results. Overall, both recognition and follow-up rates were higher when Labstand was used, but not to a statistically significant level. However, significantly higher follow-up rates were found when Labstand was used by residents with lower than average Internal Medicine National Board scores. In contrast, follow-up was higher when normal range laboratory reports were used by residents with higher than average scores. These findings seem consistent with the fact that use of Labstand requires minimal knowledge of ranges and biological measurement units and may indicate that the lower scoring residents have a greater need for such a new system than do the higher scoring residents.

摘要

介绍了一种名为Labstand的计算机系统,该系统旨在简化向临床医生呈现实验室数据的方式。它将数据转换为0至100范围内的标准单位(su),所有测试的标准单位相同。转换基于临床经验确定的正常范围和异常范围,以便能够立即识别异常情况并估计异常程度。本文报告了一项使用该系统的研究结果,该研究涉及1412项异常实验室结果。总体而言,使用Labstand时识别率和随访率均较高,但未达到统计学显著水平。然而,发现内科全国委员会分数低于平均水平的住院医师使用Labstand时,随访率显著更高。相比之下,分数高于平均水平的住院医师使用正常范围实验室报告时,随访率更高。这些发现似乎与以下事实一致:使用Labstand对范围和生物测量单位的知识要求最低,并且可能表明分数较低的住院医师比分数较高的住院医师更需要这样的新系统。

相似文献

1
Labstand: a computerized system for reporting clinical laboratory data in standard units.实验室数据站:一个用于以标准单位报告临床实验室数据的计算机化系统。
J Fam Pract. 1978 Mar;6(3):611-20.
2
Computer assisted monitoring in intensive medicine.重症医学中的计算机辅助监测
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1978;29(3):287-304.
3
Determinants of physician recognition and follow-up of abnormal laboratory values.医生对异常实验室检查结果的识别与随访的决定因素。
J Fam Pract. 1978 Aug;7(2):341-9.
4
A computerized data-handling system in hypertension management.高血压管理中的计算机化数据处理系统。
Arch Intern Med. 1980 Mar;140(3):345-50.
5
Laboratory parameter profiles among patients with cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者的实验室参数概况。
J Cyst Fibros. 2007 Apr;6(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
6
Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.关于:罗森塔尔·迪、格拉茨坦·埃。《我们有了一种治疗方法,但疾病是什么?》,《肿瘤学家》1996年;第1期。
Oncologist. 1997;2(1):59-61.
7
A portable laboratory test reference for handheld computers: evaluation on an internal medicine clerkship.一种用于手持计算机的便携式实验室测试参考资料:在内科实习中的评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Mar;129(3):439-44. doi: 10.1309/5044VKTB6MMMNVGM.
8
[Quality assurance of analytical methods to guarantee the reliability of medical decision levels for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].[确保临床实验室数据解读中医疗决策水平可靠性的分析方法质量保证]
Rinsho Byori. 2004 Jun;52(6):548-51.
9
[Calculation of normal range using a nonlinear least squares method].
Rinsho Byori. 1994 Jan;42(1):89-93.
10
Laboratory values in the elderly. Are they different?老年人的实验室检查值。它们有差异吗?
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1990 May;8(2):241-54.