Bingham J S
Br J Vener Dis. 1984 Jun;60(3):175-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.60.3.175.
A single blind study of 103 women with vaginal candidosis was undertaken to compare treatment with conventional topical clotrimazole and oral ketoconazole. Both treatment regimens were equally effective in terms of clinical symptoms, negative results on culture for Candida albicans, and relapse rates. As treatment for vaginal candidosis takes several days, patient compliance is important and the success of a treatment regimen may depend on its acceptability to patients. Those in this study who had previously been treated for vaginal candidosis were asked to compare their current and previous treatments. Significantly more (p less than 0.001) of those treated with ketoconazole than those treated with clotrimazole found it more acceptable than previous treatment. This indicated a strong preference for oral treatment, and oral antifungal agents may be the treatment of choice for vaginal candidosis in the future.
对103名阴道念珠菌病女性患者进行了一项单盲研究,以比较传统局部用克霉唑与口服酮康唑的治疗效果。两种治疗方案在临床症状、白色念珠菌培养阴性结果及复发率方面同样有效。由于阴道念珠菌病的治疗需要数天时间,患者的依从性很重要,治疗方案的成功可能取决于患者对其的接受程度。在这项研究中,曾接受过阴道念珠菌病治疗的患者被要求比较他们当前和以前的治疗。接受酮康唑治疗的患者中,认为其比以前治疗更可接受的人数显著多于接受克霉唑治疗的患者(p小于0.001)。这表明对口服治疗有强烈偏好,口服抗真菌药物未来可能成为阴道念珠菌病的首选治疗方法。