McClain E W
J Pers Assess. 1978 Apr;42(2):159-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4202_8.
By means of Allport's Religious Orientation Inventory (ROI) 145 students were classified as intrinsically religious and 133 as nonreligious. Personality differences between the two groups were explored on the basis of their scores on EPPS, the CPI, and 16 PF Questionnaire. Factor analysis of the combined 49 subscales of these three instruments produced eight factors: Achievement Potential, Self-Control, Social Ascendency, Affiliation, Personal and Social Adequacy, Egocentric Sexuality, Restlessness, and Stereotyped Femininity. Analyses of variance of the factor scores of the two groups of subjects showed significant differences on five of the eight factors, accounting for a total of 25% of the total variance. The intrinsically religious scored significantly higher on Self-Control, Personal and Social Adequacy, and Stereotyped Femininity; the nonreligious scored higher on Egocentric Sexuality and Restlessness. These results were discussed in relation to some of Allport's ideas on religion as a dimension of personality.
借助奥尔波特的宗教取向量表（ROI），145名学生被归类为内在宗教型，133名学生被归类为非宗教型。基于他们在爱德华个人偏好量表（EPPS）、加州心理调查表（CPI）和卡特尔16种人格因素问卷上的得分，对两组学生的人格差异进行了探究。对这三种量表合并后的49个分量表进行因子分析，得出了八个因子：成就潜力、自我控制、社会支配性、归属需求、个人与社会适应性、自我中心性性欲、不安和刻板女性气质。对两组受试者的因子得分进行方差分析，结果显示在八个因子中的五个因子上存在显著差异，共占总方差的25%。内在宗教型在自我控制、个人与社会适应性以及刻板女性气质方面得分显著更高；非宗教型在自我中心性性欲和不安方面得分更高。结合奥尔波特关于宗教作为人格维度的一些观点，对这些结果进行了讨论。
