N Engl J Med. 1984 Nov 22;311(21):1333-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198411223112102.
We evaluated long-term survival after coronary-artery bypass grafting in 686 patients with stable angina who were randomly assigned to medical or surgical treatment at 13 hospitals and followed for an average of 11.2 years. For all patients and for the 595 without left main coronary-artery disease, cumulative survival did not differ significantly at 11 years according to treatment. The 7-year survival rates for all patients were 70 per cent with medical treatment and 77 per cent with surgery (P = 0.043), and the 11-year rates were 57 and 58 per cent, respectively. For patients without left main coronary-artery disease, the 7-year rates were 72 and 77 per cent in medically and surgically treated patients, respectively (P = 0.267), and the 11-year rates were 58 per cent in both groups. A statistically significant difference in survival suggesting a benefit from surgical treatment was found in patients without left main coronary-artery disease who were subdivided into high-risk subgroups defined angiographically, clinically, or by a combination of angiographic and clinical factors: (1) high angiographic risk (three-vessel disease and impaired left ventricular function)--at 7 years, 52 per cent in medically treated patients versus 76 per cent in surgically treated patients (P = 0.002); at 11 years, 38 and 50 per cent, respectively (P = 0.026); (2) clinically defined high risk (at least two of the following: resting ST depression, history of myocardial infarction, or history of hypertension)--at 7 years, 52 per cent in the medical group versus 72 per cent in the surgical group (P = 0.003); at 11 years, 36 versus 49 per cent, respectively (P = 0.015); and (3) combined angiographic and clinical high risk--at 7 years, 36 per cent in the medical group versus 76 per cent in the surgical group (P = 0.002); at 11 years, 24 versus 54 per cent, respectively (P = 0.005). Survival among patients with impaired left ventricular function differed significantly at 7 years (63 per cent in the medical group versus 74 per cent in the surgical group [P = 0.049]) but not at 11 years (49 versus 53 per cent). The surgical treatment policy resulted in a nonsignificant survival disadvantage throughout the 11 years in subgroups with normal left ventricular function, low angiographic risk, and low clinical risk, and a statistically significant disadvantage at 11 years in patients with two-vessel disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们评估了686例稳定型心绞痛患者冠状动脉搭桥术后的长期生存率,这些患者在13家医院被随机分配接受药物治疗或手术治疗,并平均随访了11.2年。对于所有患者以及595例无左主干冠状动脉疾病的患者,根据治疗方法,11年时的累积生存率无显著差异。所有患者的7年生存率,药物治疗组为70%,手术治疗组为77%(P = 0.043),11年生存率分别为57%和58%。对于无左主干冠状动脉疾病的患者,7年生存率,药物治疗组和手术治疗组分别为72%和77%(P = 0.267),两组11年生存率均为58%。在无左主干冠状动脉疾病且根据血管造影、临床或血管造影与临床因素组合定义为高危亚组的患者中,发现手术治疗在生存方面有统计学显著差异,提示手术治疗有益:(1)血管造影高危(三支血管病变和左心室功能受损)——7年时,药物治疗组患者为52%,手术治疗组为76%(P = 0.002);11年时,分别为38%和50%(P = 0.026);(2)临床定义的高危(以下至少两项:静息ST段压低、心肌梗死病史或高血压病史)——7年时,药物治疗组为52%,手术治疗组为72%(P = 0.003);11年时,分别为36%和49%(P = 0.015);(3)血管造影与临床联合高危——7年时,药物治疗组为36%,手术治疗组为76%(P = 0.002);11年时,分别为24%和54%(P = 0.005)。左心室功能受损患者的生存率在7年时有显著差异(药物治疗组为63%,手术治疗组为74% [P = 0.049]),但在11年时无差异(分别为49%和53%)。手术治疗策略在左心室功能正常、血管造影低危和临床低危亚组的整个11年中导致生存方面无显著劣势,而在双支血管病变患者中11年时有统计学显著劣势。(摘要截短至400字)