Suppr超能文献

肛门扩张器在急性肛裂保守治疗中的应用

The anal dilator in the conservative management of acute anal fissures.

作者信息

McDonald P, Driscoll A M, Nicholls R J

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1983 Jan;70(1):25-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800700109.

Abstract

Patients presenting with acute anal fissure were randomized into two treatment groups in a prospective clinical trial. Both groups received treatment for 3 weeks with a stool softener and lignocaine jelly. Those entered in group 1 (35 patients) were asked in addition to insert an anal dilator (no. 2) twice daily while those in group 2 (31 patients) applied the anaesthetic jelly without a dilator. At 6 weeks 11 (31.4 per cent) patients in group 1 and 12 (38.7 per cent) patients in group 2 had been referred for sphincterotomy owing to failure of the treatment. At 6 months this figure had risen to 14 (40 per cent) in group 1 and 15 (48.4 per cent) in group 2. This difference was not statistically significant, suggesting that the addition of a dilator to the conservative treatment regimen did not diminish the likelihood of surgery.

摘要

在一项前瞻性临床试验中,将患有急性肛裂的患者随机分为两个治疗组。两组均使用软化大便药物和利多卡因凝胶治疗3周。第1组(35例患者)除上述治疗外,还被要求每天两次插入2号肛门扩张器,而第2组(31例患者)仅使用麻醉凝胶,不使用扩张器。6周时,第1组有11例(31.4%)患者、第2组有12例(38.7%)患者因治疗失败而被转诊接受括约肌切开术。6个月时,该数字在第1组升至14例(40%),在第2组升至15例(48.4%)。这种差异无统计学意义,表明在保守治疗方案中增加扩张器并不会降低手术的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验