Richardson D A, Evans M I, Cibils L A
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Mar 1;145(5):621-32. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91208-5.
A survey of results of midforceps delivery in mother and fetus was carried out, reviewing the most relevant publications of the past several years. Many discrepancies have been found from definition of what is (or should be) considered midforceps delivery to methods of gathering the material for analysis and the statistical evaluations. Specific study of some of these results was done which revealed possible flaws in the conclusions reached by the authors. Clearly maternal mortality is no longer a justifiable aspect to be studied. However, maternal morbidity should be considered and compared to that associated with vaginal and/or cesarean section deliveries. Likewise perinatal mortality and morbidity should be the standard of study and, in particular, long-term follow-up of infants delivered by the various methods. Until those observations are made from reliable data of comparable populations, it is probably not justified to condemn midforceps deliveries well conducted and judiciously indicated.
我们对产钳助产对母婴的影响结果进行了一项调查,回顾了过去几年最相关的出版物。从(或应该)被视为产钳助产的定义到收集分析材料的方法以及统计评估,发现了许多差异。对其中一些结果进行了具体研究,发现作者得出的结论可能存在缺陷。显然,孕产妇死亡率已不再是一个值得研究的合理方面。然而,应考虑孕产妇发病率,并与阴道分娩和/或剖宫产分娩的发病率进行比较。同样,围产期死亡率和发病率也应作为研究标准,特别是对通过各种方法分娩的婴儿进行长期随访。在从可比人群的可靠数据中得出这些观察结果之前,谴责操作得当且指征明确的产钳助产可能是不合理的。