Suppr超能文献

控制机械通气与间歇强制通气中的呼吸机所致气压伤

Ventilator-induced barotrauma in controlled mechanical ventilation versus intermittent mandatory ventilation.

作者信息

Mathru M, Rao T L, Venus B

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1983 May;11(5):359-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198305000-00008.

Abstract

Retrospective analysis of pulmonary barotrauma incidence in 292 patients ventilated greater than or equal to 24 h was conducted. From 1971-1973, 156 patients with acute respiratory insufficiency were managed with controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) and PEEP. During 1973-1976, 136 patients were supported with IMV and CPAP. Despite higher mean peak and end-expiratory airway pressure, the IMV-CPAP group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of ventilator-induced barotrauma; 7% vs 22% (p less than 0.01). We suspect the difference is related to fewer mechanical breaths with IMV and not to the level of end-expiratory pressure employed.

摘要

对292例机械通气时间大于或等于24小时的患者的肺气压伤发生率进行了回顾性分析。1971年至1973年,156例急性呼吸功能不全患者采用控制机械通气(CMV)和呼气末正压通气(PEEP)进行治疗。1973年至1976年,136例患者采用间歇指令通气(IMV)和持续气道正压通气(CPAP)进行支持治疗。尽管IMV-CPAP组的平均峰值气道压和呼气末气道压较高,但其呼吸机诱导的气压伤发生率显著较低;分别为7%和22%(p<0.01)。我们怀疑这种差异与IMV时机械通气次数较少有关,而与所采用的呼气末压力水平无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验