• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮电刺激神经缓解分娩疼痛(作者译)

[Pain relief during delivery by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (author's transl)].

作者信息

Bundsen P, Carlsson C A, Forssman L, Tyreman N O

出版信息

Prakt Anaesth. 1978 Feb;13(1):20-8.

PMID:634896
Abstract

The analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TNS) during delivery has been evaluated. The usual technique of TNS was modified to suit the specific needs of pain control during the whole course of delivery. Two pairs of electrodes were taped to the patient's back, one pair level with the spinal processes Th 10-L1 and the other with S2-S4, corresponding to the influx of pain during the first and second stages respectively. Stimulation was delivered as biphasic pulses at 60-80 Hz. A low-intensity stimulation was given continuously, and a high-intensity stimulation was initiated by the patient herself whenever pain increased. As a rule, stimulation via the thoracic electrodes was given throughout delivery and sacral stimulation added from the later part of the first stage. No complications with respect to mother or child have occured. Three hundred and forty-seven women have been treated, 47% of them considered the analgesia with TNS to be good or very good, 42% experienced a certain effect whil 11% considered that TNS made no difference. In view of the relatively good results and the absence of complications, the authors recommend the method as a primary pain relieving measure to which conventional methods can be added if necessary.

摘要

分娩期间经皮电神经刺激(TENS)的镇痛效果已得到评估。对TENS的常规技术进行了改进,以适应分娩全过程疼痛控制的特殊需求。将两对电极贴在患者背部,一对与胸10至腰1椎体棘突水平对齐,另一对与骶2至骶4水平对齐,分别对应第一产程和第二产程的疼痛传入部位。以60 - 80赫兹的双相脉冲进行刺激。持续给予低强度刺激,当疼痛加剧时由患者自己启动高强度刺激。通常,整个分娩过程中通过胸部电极进行刺激,从第一产程后期开始增加骶部刺激。未出现与母婴相关的并发症。已对347名女性进行治疗,其中47%的女性认为TENS镇痛效果良好或非常好,42%的女性有一定效果,11%的女性认为TENS没有效果。鉴于相对良好的结果以及无并发症,作者推荐该方法作为主要的疼痛缓解措施,必要时可加用传统方法。

相似文献

1
[Pain relief during delivery by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (author's transl)].经皮电刺激神经缓解分娩疼痛(作者译)
Prakt Anaesth. 1978 Feb;13(1):20-8.
2
Pain relief during delivery by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.经皮电刺激神经缓解分娩疼痛。
Pain. 1977 Oct;4(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(77)90087-2.
3
[Pain relief in childbirth; an analysis of the analgesic effects of transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TNS), pethidine and placebos (author's transl)].分娩中的疼痛缓解;经皮神经电刺激(TNS)、哌替啶和安慰剂镇痛效果的分析(作者译)
Prakt Anaesth. 1978 Feb;13(1):13-20.
4
[The effect of transcutaneous nerve stimulation on labor pain (author's transl)].经皮神经刺激对分娩疼痛的影响(作者译)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1978 Dec;38(12):1079-84.
5
Pain relief during delivery. An evaluation of conventional methods.分娩时的疼痛缓解。传统方法的评估。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(4):289-97.
6
Pain relief in labor by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. A prospective matched study.经皮电刺激神经缓解分娩疼痛。一项前瞻性配对研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1981;60(5):459-68. doi: 10.3109/00016348109155461.
7
Transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a controlled study.
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1980;69(6):273-7.
8
Pain relief in labor by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Testing of a modified stimulation technique and evaluation of the neurological and biochemical condition of the newborn infant.经皮电刺激神经缓解分娩疼痛。改良刺激技术的测试及新生儿神经和生化状况的评估。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(2):129-36. doi: 10.3109/00016348209156543.
9
A randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic approaches for relief of low back pain during labor.一项关于分娩期间缓解腰痛的非药物方法的随机对照试验。
J Fam Pract. 1999 Apr;48(4):259-63.
10
Pain relief in labor by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Safety aspects.经皮电刺激神经缓解分娩疼痛。安全性方面。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(1):1-5. doi: 10.3109/00016348209156941.