Bundsen P, Peterson L E, Selstam U
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(4):289-97.
The study evaluates the effect of conventional obstetric analgesia on 544 parturients and their newborn infants. The parturients' pain situation was evaluated with respect to both the effect of pain relief given, and the total pain experience in the first and second stage. This gave a more correct view of the parturients' pain situation and effectiveness of the analgesic procedures that if one or the other estimation was used separately. Nearly 20% of all parturients experienced good effect on low-back or suprapubic pain in the first stage. Severe to almost unbearable pain was experienced by about 60% of all parturients in the first stage as well as in the second stage. The duration of labor showed a strong positive correlation (p less than 0.0001) to the pain intensity in the first stage and a strong negative correlation (p less than 0.0001) to the degree of cervical dilation at admission. No adverse effects on the newborn infants were seen, apart from the well-known association between the drug--delivery interval and the slightly depressant effects of pethidine.
该研究评估了传统产科镇痛对544名产妇及其新生儿的影响。从所给予的疼痛缓解效果以及第一和第二产程中的总体疼痛体验方面对产妇的疼痛情况进行了评估。与单独使用其中一种评估方法相比,这样能更准确地了解产妇的疼痛情况以及镇痛程序的效果。近20%的产妇在第一产程中对下背部或耻骨上疼痛有良好的缓解效果。约60%的产妇在第一产程和第二产程中都经历了严重到几乎难以忍受的疼痛。产程持续时间与第一产程中的疼痛强度呈强正相关(p<0.0001),与入院时宫颈扩张程度呈强负相关(p<0.0001)。除了众所周知的药物 - 分娩间隔与哌替啶的轻微抑制作用之间的关联外,未观察到对新生儿有不良影响。