路透离心空气采样器：有效气流率和采集效率的测量
Reuter centrifugal air sampler: measurement of effective airflow rate and collection efficiency.
作者信息
Macher J M, First M W
出版信息
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jun;45(6):1960-2. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.6.1960-1962.1983.
Abstract
Incorrect calculation of effective air sampling rate and disregard of differences in collection efficiency among samplers can lead to false conclusions about the usefulness of samplers for measuring concentrations of airborne microorganisms.
摘要
有效空气采样率计算错误以及忽视采样器之间采集效率的差异，可能会导致关于采样器在测量空气中微生物浓度方面有用性的错误结论。
相似文献
1
Reuter centrifugal air sampler: measurement of effective airflow rate and collection efficiency.路透离心空气采样器：有效气流率和采集效率的测量
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jun;45(6):1960-2. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.6.1960-1962.1983.
2
Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.利用新型细菌气溶胶发生器对商用细菌空气采样器进行评估。
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1981 Mar;28(1):7-21.
3
Air sampling in hospitals.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;353:230-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb18926.x.
4
Comparison of two biological aerosol sampling methods.两种生物气溶胶采样方法的比较。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Jan;53(1):99-104. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.1.99-104.1987.
5
Comparison of Andersen eight-stage and two-stage viable air samplers.安德森八阶段和两阶段活菌空气采样器的比较。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Jan;35(1):208-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.35.1.208-209.1978.
6
Comparison of bacterial recovery by Reuter centrifugal air sampler and slit-to-agar sampler.路透离心空气采样器与狭缝-琼脂采样器细菌回收情况的比较。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Aug;44(2):512-3. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.2.512-513.1982.
7
Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.两种用于监测空气中真菌繁殖体的空气采样器的性能比较。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003 May;36(5):613-6. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2003000500008. Epub 2003 Apr 22.
8
A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.用于计数真菌气溶胶的四种采样器的现场比较 I. 采样特性
Indoor Air. 2004 Oct;14(5):360-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00259.x.
9
Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.生物气溶胶采样器的选择应考虑采样器的效率和覆盖微生物多样性的能力。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Nov 15;84(23). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01589-18. Print 2018 Dec 1.
10
Comparison of methods for quantitative determinations of airborne bacteria and evaluation of total viable counts.空气中细菌定量测定方法的比较及总活菌数评估
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jul;44(1):179-83. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.1.179-183.1982.
引用本文的文献
1
Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.生物气溶胶采样：经典方法、进展与展望
Aerosol Sci Technol. 2020;54(5):496-519. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1671950. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
2
Airborne fungal colony-forming units in outdoor and indoor environments in Yokohama, Japan.日本横滨室外和室内环境中的空气传播真菌菌落形成单位
Mycopathologia. 1997;139(1):23-33. doi: 10.1023/a:1006831111595.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparison of bacterial recovery by Reuter centrifugal air sampler and slit-to-agar sampler.路透离心空气采样器与狭缝-琼脂采样器细菌回收情况的比较。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Aug;44(2):512-3. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.2.512-513.1982.
2
The performance of the Biotest RCS centrifugal air sampler.
J Hosp Infect. 1981 Jun;2(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(81)90028-1.
Zotero 插件