Suppr超能文献

从历史角度看加拿大的医学主导地位:医学的兴衰?

Medical dominance in Canada in historical perspective: the rise and fall of medicine?

作者信息

Coburn D, Torrance G M, Kaufert J M

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1983;13(3):407-32. doi: 10.2190/D94Q-0F9Y-VYQH-PX2V.

Abstract

Freidson's concept of medical dominance is compared to the alternative conceptions of neo-Marxist writers. Dominance is then examined in historical perspective, using medicine in Canada (mainly Ontario) as a case study. Medicine emerged as the dominant health occupation in Canada in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, consolidating its power between World War I and the Saskatchewan doctors' strike of 1962. The authors argue that medical dominance has declined since that time due to such factors as the involvement of the state in health insurance, the rise of other health occupations, increasing public or at least elite skepticism, and possible internal fragmentation. The underlying social explanation for this historical process is sought in changes in the Canadian class structure, specifically the spread of the capitalist mode of production, the decline of the petite bourgeoisie, and the rise of the state. It is suggested that Freidson's specific accounts of the history of medicine must be incorporated for explanatory purposes within the broader neo-Marxist view of medicine as an intermediary rather than an ultimately determining institution.

摘要

将弗里德森的医学主导概念与新马克思主义作家的其他概念进行了比较。然后从历史角度审视主导地位,以加拿大(主要是安大略省)的医学为例进行研究。在19世纪末20世纪初,医学成为加拿大占主导地位的健康职业,并在第一次世界大战至1962年萨斯喀彻温省医生罢工期间巩固了其权力。作者认为,自那时以来,由于国家参与医疗保险、其他健康职业的兴起、公众(至少是精英阶层)日益增长的怀疑态度以及可能的内部分裂等因素,医学主导地位已经下降。这一历史进程的潜在社会解释在于加拿大阶级结构的变化,特别是资本主义生产方式的传播、小资产阶级的衰落以及国家的兴起。有人建议,为了解释的目的,必须将弗里德森对医学史的具体描述纳入更广泛的新马克思主义观点之中,即将医学视为一种中介机构而非最终决定性机构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验