Greene S A, Smith M A, Baum J D
Arch Dis Child. 1983 Aug;58(8):578-81. doi: 10.1136/adc.58.8.578.
Seven volunteers aged 12.0 to 17.9 years participated in a trial to compare conventional insulin treatment with continuous open loop (pump) insulin infusion. After 6 weeks of conventional treatment followed by 6 weeks of insulin pump treatment, 4 children chose to manage their diabetes permanently by means of the insulin pump. The mean blood glucose concentration (based on home blood glucose monitoring) while on conventional insulin treatment showed no appreciable change during the 6 weeks' treatment on an insulin pump. Compared with conventional treatment, however, the mean 24 hour blood glucose profiles of the patients on pump insulin showed less variation in the blood glucose throughout the day, together with an appreciably lower peak after breakfast. These improvements occurred despite increased dietary flexibility while on pump insulin. The insulin pump seems to be an acceptable form of treatment for some children and young adults with diabetes mellitus and gives near physiological control of blood glucose.
7名年龄在12.0至17.9岁之间的志愿者参与了一项试验,以比较传统胰岛素治疗与持续开环(泵)胰岛素输注。在接受6周的传统治疗后再进行6周的胰岛素泵治疗后,4名儿童选择通过胰岛素泵永久管理他们的糖尿病。基于家庭血糖监测,在接受胰岛素泵治疗的6周期间,传统胰岛素治疗时的平均血糖浓度没有明显变化。然而,与传统治疗相比,接受泵胰岛素治疗的患者24小时平均血糖曲线显示全天血糖变化较小,早餐后峰值明显更低。尽管在使用泵胰岛素时饮食灵活性增加,但仍出现了这些改善。胰岛素泵似乎是一些糖尿病儿童和青少年可以接受的治疗方式,并且能使血糖接近生理控制水平。