Cicchetti D V, Prusoff B A
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Sep;40(9):987-90. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790080069009.
Interrater reliability assessments were undertaken for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Raskin Depression Rating Scale, and the Degree of Mental Illness Scale. Levels of reliability ranged from "poor" to "excellent" and varied as a function of (1) temporality (assessments made at termination of clinical trial more reliable than those made at randomization into treatment) and (2) unit of scoring (factor or total scores more reliable than single-item assessments). The implications of these results may be considered in the context of further studies evaluating the efficacy of treatment interventions on reduction of symptoms of clinical depression.
对汉密尔顿抑郁量表、拉斯金抑郁量表和精神疾病程度量表进行了评分者间信度评估。信度水平从“差”到“优”不等,并因以下因素而有所不同:(1) 时间性(临床试验结束时进行的评估比随机分组进入治疗时进行的评估更可靠)和 (2) 评分单位(因子或总分比单项评估更可靠)。在进一步研究评估治疗干预对减轻临床抑郁症状的疗效时,可考虑这些结果的意义。