Martin F, Farley A, Gagnon M, Poitras P, Bensemana D
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1983;83:37-41.
The aim of this study was to compare the healing capacities of sucralfate and cimetidine in gastric ulcer. Twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to active sucralfate (1 g qid) and cimetidine placebo, or to cimetidine (300 mg qid) and sucralfate placebo. The patients were endoscoped before entry into the study, after 4 wk, and after 8 wk if complete healing was not found at 4 wk. Twenty-five patients completed the study. After 4 wk, 50% (6/12) of the sucralfate patients had healed in comparison to 54% (7/13) of cimetidine patients. After 8 wk, the cumulative healing rates were 75% and 77%, respectively. The results indicate that sucralfate is as effective as cimetidine in the short-term treatment of gastric ulcer.
本研究的目的是比较硫糖铝和西咪替丁治疗胃溃疡的愈合能力。29例患者被随机分为接受活性硫糖铝(1克,每日4次)和西咪替丁安慰剂组,或接受西咪替丁(300毫克,每日4次)和硫糖铝安慰剂组。患者在进入研究前、4周后以及如果4周时未完全愈合则在8周后接受内镜检查。25例患者完成了研究。4周后,硫糖铝组50%(6/12)的患者愈合,而西咪替丁组为54%(7/13)。8周后,累积愈合率分别为75%和77%。结果表明,在胃溃疡的短期治疗中,硫糖铝与西咪替丁疗效相当。