Suppr超能文献

屠刀伤口,它们真的如此受污染吗?

Butcher's knife wounds, are they really so contaminated?

作者信息

de Boer A, van Saene H K, Smit M P

出版信息

Hand. 1983 Oct;15(3):335-40.

PMID:6357967
Abstract

The aerobic flora found in wounds caused by butcher's knives was compared with the flora in similar wounds caused by other sharp objects. Gram-positive bacteria predominated in the wounds caused by butcher's knives while the other cuts were colonised predominantly by Gram-negative flora. Identically low concentrations of colonising bacteria were found in both groups. The qualitative analysis provided no bacteriological argument for treating a wound from a butcher's knife as being more infected and therefore produced no contraindication for the primary reconstruction of damaged structures (i.e., tendons and nerves) together with skin closure in this type of injury.

摘要

将屠夫刀所致伤口中的需氧菌群与其他锐器所致类似伤口中的菌群进行了比较。在屠夫刀所致伤口中革兰氏阳性菌占主导,而其他伤口则主要由革兰氏阴性菌群定殖。两组中定殖细菌的浓度均同样低。定性分析未提供细菌学依据来表明屠夫刀所致伤口感染性更强,因此对于此类损伤在缝合皮肤的同时对受损结构(即肌腱和神经)进行一期重建不存在禁忌证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验