Suppr超能文献

胃肠道黏膜中产生免疫球蛋白和肽类激素细胞的定量分析。直接免疫荧光法与未标记抗体过氧化物酶-抗过氧化物酶法的比较。

Quantitation of immunoglobulin- and peptide hormone-producing cells in gastrointestinal mucosa. Comparison of direct immunofluorescence and the unlabelled antibody peroxidase--antiperoxidase method.

作者信息

Valnes K, Brandtzaeg P, Hanssen L E, Stave R, Larsen S, Londong W

出版信息

Histochem J. 1983 Oct;15(10):1011-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01002496.

Abstract

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and the unlabelled antibody peroxidase--antiperoxidase (PAP) methods were compared on a quantitative basis with regard to visualization of IgA immunocytes and gastrin cells in human gastric mucosa, and secretin cells in canine duodenal mucosa. With both DIF and PAP, two serial sections from 13 biopsy specimens were evaluated for each cell type--thus keeping tissue preparation the same with both staining methods. The three cell types were well visualized regardless of method, and there was no significant difference between cell numbers recorded with the DIF or PAP. When blind duplicate counts were obtained with an interval of three weeks, comparisons of weighted differences and the Kendall's rank correlation test indicated good precision; the reproducibility of duplicate enumerations with each method was comparable to that between the two methods. It was concluded that DIF and PAP are equally applicable for studies of these three cell types under the conditions used in this investigation.

摘要

在定量方面,对直接免疫荧光法(DIF)和未标记抗体过氧化物酶 - 抗过氧化物酶法(PAP)进行了比较,以观察人胃黏膜中的IgA免疫细胞和胃泌素细胞,以及犬十二指肠黏膜中的促胰液素细胞。使用DIF和PAP时,对13份活检标本的两个连续切片进行每种细胞类型的评估,从而使两种染色方法的组织制备相同。无论采用哪种方法,这三种细胞类型都能清晰可见,并且DIF或PAP记录的细胞数量之间没有显著差异。当每隔三周进行一次盲法重复计数时,加权差异比较和肯德尔等级相关检验表明具有良好的精密度;每种方法的重复计数的可重复性与两种方法之间的可重复性相当。得出的结论是,在本研究使用的条件下,DIF和PAP同样适用于这三种细胞类型的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验