Florence J M, Pandya S, King W M, Robison J D, Signore L C, Wentzell M, Province M A
Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):41-5. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.41.
A multiclinic, collaborative study has been designed to assess the natural progression and efficacy of treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. This article describes the protocol for the evaluation technique and the method used to establish within (intraobserver) and between (interobserver) reliability of the protocol evaluation procedures. Standardized patient evaluations were used, and consistency of evaluation was monitored by a computer. The reliability of the measures was analyzed 1) within observers by comparing the results of each of the first three tests done by each evaluator for all patients and 2) between observers by comparing, at multicenter group meetings, the results of each of the four evaluators' tests of the same patient. We have demonstrated reliability for an evaluation method that will provide an objective foundation on which to claim a drug or therapeutic procedure does or does not have an effect in treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
一项多中心合作研究旨在评估杜氏肌营养不良症的自然病程和治疗效果。本文描述了评估技术的方案以及用于确定该方案评估程序在观察者内部(观察者内)和观察者之间(观察者间)可靠性的方法。使用了标准化的患者评估,并通过计算机监测评估的一致性。对测量的可靠性进行了分析:1)在观察者内部,通过比较每位评估者对所有患者进行的前三项测试中的每一项结果;2)在观察者之间,通过在多中心小组会议上比较四位评估者对同一患者的每项测试结果。我们已经证明了一种评估方法的可靠性,该方法将提供一个客观基础,据此可以宣称一种药物或治疗程序在治疗杜氏肌营养不良症方面是否有效。