精神病患者的承诺程序。西部各州的状况变化
The commitment process for psychiatric patients. Changing status in the Western States.
作者信息
Shore J H
出版信息
West J Med. 1978 Mar;128(3):207-11.
Abstract
Recent changes in commitment legislation for the mentally ill have had an important impact on the role of physicians in treating these patients. New commitment laws emphasize civil rights at the expense of right-to-treatment concepts, sometimes causing neglect of severely psychotic persons. Only four western states have a high rating of conformity with a model commitment statute.
摘要
近期针对精神病患者的强制住院立法变化对医生治疗这些患者的角色产生了重要影响。新的强制住院法律强调公民权利，却以治疗权概念为代价，有时导致对重度精神病患者的忽视。只有四个西部州在与示范强制住院法规的一致性方面获得高分。
相似文献
1
The commitment process for psychiatric patients. Changing status in the Western States.精神病患者的承诺程序。西部各州的状况变化
West J Med. 1978 Mar;128(3):207-11.
2
Changing trends in mental health legislation: anatomy of reforming a civil commitment law.心理健康立法的变化趋势：一部民事收容法的改革剖析
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Winter;21(4):771-805.
3
Oregon's civil commitment, statute: Stone's "thank-you theory" - a judicial survey.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1979;7(4):381-9.
4
Thirty-five years of working with civil commitment statutes.与民事拘押法规相关的35年工作经历。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004;32(4):430-9.
5
The involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania: a comparative analysis.美国和罗马尼亚对精神疾病患者的非自愿民事住院治疗：一项比较分析。
Rev Rom Bioet. 2003 Jan-Mar;1(1):55-88.
6
Where involuntary commitment, civil liberties, and the right to mental health care collide: an overview of California's mental illness system.
Hastings Law J. 2003 Jan;54(2):493-523.
7
[Mentally ill and dangerous: civil commitment or internment? The Belgian judicial framework].[精神疾病患者与危险：民事强制住院还是拘禁？比利时司法框架]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2009;51(4):217-25.
8
Vicious circles in civil commitment.
Soc Work. 1979 Mar;24(2):127-31.
9
The empirical consequences and policy implications of broadening the statutory criteria for civil commitment.扩大民事强制住院法定标准的实证后果及政策影响。
Yale Law Policy Rev. 1985 Spring;3(2):395-446.
10
Compulsory admission of the mentally ill.
Med J Aust. 1977 Jun 25;1(26):964-5.
本文引用的文献
1
The effect of legal counsel on admissions to a state mental hospital: a confrontation of professions.
J Health Soc Behav. 1969 Mar;10(1):66-72.
2
New approaches to mental health in the California legislature.
Int Psychiatry Clin. 1969;6(3):361-78.
3
The criminalization of mentally disordered behavior: possible side-effect of a new mental health law.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1972 Apr;23(4):101-5.
4
Criteria for involuntary hospitalization.非自愿住院标准。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972 May;26(5):399-404. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750230009002.
5
Involuntary hospitalization: what for and how long?
Am J Psychiatry. 1974 Feb;131(2):219-23. doi: 10.1176/ajp.131.2.219.
6
Overview: the right to treatment--comments on the law and its impact.
Am J Psychiatry. 1975 Nov;132(11):1125-34. doi: 10.1176/ajp.132.11.1125.
7
Recent mental health litigation: a critical perspective.近期心理健康诉讼：批判性视角
Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Mar;134(3):273-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.134.3.273.
8
Implications of California's new mental health law.
Am J Psychiatry. 1975 Mar;132(3):251-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.132.3.251.
Zotero 插件