Coppen A
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1983;308:27-30.
Short-term, long-term and prophylactic trials are all important for the thorough assessment of a new antidepressant. Patients are carefully selected for such trials according to rigidly applied selection criteria, and their depressive disorder should be rated using a standard classification system. Multicentre trials are often a useful means of obtaining sufficient numbers of patients for valid conclusions to be drawn, but different assessors obtain quite different results even on the same rating scales. Thus, ideally, the assessors should undergo centralized training in such rating. A useful method of circumventing these problems is to use a more objective test, such as the dexamethasone suppression test. Trials should also compare the new drug with placebo and standard antidepressants (e.g. 150 mg/day amitriptyline). The safety profile should be carefully established by monitoring side-effects and investigating interactions with commonly used drugs (including alcohol). Most new antidepressants are found to be equally as effective as, but no better than, standard antidepressant therapy. However, many new antidepressants have the advantage of causing fewer side-effects.
短期、长期和预防性试验对于全面评估一种新型抗抑郁药都很重要。根据严格应用的选择标准,为这类试验精心挑选患者,其抑郁症应使用标准分类系统进行评定。多中心试验通常是获得足够数量患者以得出有效结论的有用方法,但即使使用相同的评定量表,不同的评估者也会得出 quite different results (此处原文有误,应是“quite different results”,意为“截然不同的结果”)。因此,理想情况下,评估者应接受关于此类评定的集中培训。规避这些问题的一种有用方法是使用更客观的测试,如地塞米松抑制试验。试验还应将新药与安慰剂和标准抗抑郁药(如每天150毫克阿米替林)进行比较。应通过监测副作用并研究与常用药物(包括酒精)的相互作用来仔细确定安全性。大多数新型抗抑郁药被发现与标准抗抑郁治疗同样有效,但并不比其更好。然而,许多新型抗抑郁药具有副作用较少的优势。