Lader M H
Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, Bethlem Royal, United Kingdom.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:39-44.
Current antidepressants achieve similar efficacy, with 60% to 80% of patients responding adequately. Clinical response is gradual, and differential response factors are difficult to discern. However, side effect profiles and toxicity vary substantially, so the choice of medication depends primarily on tolerability and safety. Dry mouth is prevalent with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), whereas nausea occurs more frequently with a serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Long-term unwanted effects tend not to be a major problem, with a dropout rate of approximately 5% due to side effects. The relationship between suicidality and antidepressants remains under debate. Many TCAs are highly toxic in overdose whereas the SSRIs appear much safer. Nefazodone is a unique antidepressant with demonstrated efficacy. It is different from other antidepressants because of its two actions in the serotonin system, moderate serotonin selective reuptake blocking properties and direct 5-HT2 antagonism, which also can enhance 5-HT1 neurotransmission. The 5-HT2 antagonist properties may limit serotonin-mediated effects and, as a result, nefazodone may be more anxiolytic than other antidepressants. Nefazodone also moderately inhibits norepinephrine reuptake and blocks alpha 1-adrenergic receptors. The data base on the safety of nefazodone currently comprises approximately 3,500 patients from all research trials, which include controlled trials that allow comparisons of nefazodone treatment with several hundred patients taking TCAs or SSRIs and nearly 900 patients receiving placebo. The most frequent adverse experiences with nefazodone as compared with placebo treatment are nausea (21% vs. 14%), somnolence (19% vs. 13%), dry mouth (19% vs. 13%), dizziness (12% vs. 6%), constipation (11% vs. 7%), asthenia (11% vs. 6%), light-headedness (10% vs. 4%), and amblyopia (blurred vision; 6% vs. 3%). Approximately 12% of nefazodone-treated patients dropped out because of adverse experiences, as compared with 7.4% on placebo, 10.4% on SSRIs, but 21.8% on imipramine after short-term exposure in placebo-controlled trials. Long-term safety data include nearly 1,300 patients; nefazodone was well tolerated. Nefazodone was evaluated in normal subjects by the author and was found to produce less impairment than imipramine and was less likely to interact with alcohol. In summary, nefazodone has a favorable adverse-event profile as compared with the TCAs and a rather different one from the SSRIs. It appears to be safe and well tolerated after both acute and long-term use.
目前的抗抑郁药疗效相似,60%至80%的患者有充分反应。临床反应是渐进的,难以辨别差异反应因素。然而,副作用和毒性差异很大,因此药物选择主要取决于耐受性和安全性。口干在三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)中很常见,而恶心在5-羟色胺选择性再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)中更频繁出现。长期不良影响往往不是主要问题,因副作用导致的停药率约为5%。自杀倾向与抗抑郁药之间的关系仍在争论中。许多TCA过量时毒性很高,而SSRI似乎要安全得多。奈法唑酮是一种已证实有疗效的独特抗抑郁药。它与其他抗抑郁药不同,因为它在5-羟色胺系统中有两种作用,即适度的5-羟色胺选择性再摄取阻断特性和直接的5-HT2拮抗作用,这也能增强5-HT1神经传递。5-HT2拮抗特性可能会限制5-羟色胺介导的效应,因此,奈法唑酮可能比其他抗抑郁药更具抗焦虑作用。奈法唑酮还适度抑制去甲肾上腺素再摄取并阻断α1-肾上腺素能受体。目前关于奈法唑酮安全性的数据库包括来自所有研究试验的约3500名患者,其中包括对照试验,这些试验允许将奈法唑酮治疗与数百名服用TCA或SSRI的患者以及近900名接受安慰剂的患者进行比较。与安慰剂治疗相比,奈法唑酮最常见的不良经历是恶心(21%对14%)、嗜睡(19%对13%)、口干(19%对13%)、头晕(12%对6%)、便秘(11%对7%)、乏力(11%对6%)、头晕目眩(10%对4%)和弱视(视力模糊;6%对3%)。在安慰剂对照试验中,短期暴露后,约12%接受奈法唑酮治疗的患者因不良经历退出,而接受安慰剂的为7.4%,接受SSRI的为10.4%,接受丙咪嗪的为21.8%。长期安全性数据包括近1300名患者;奈法唑酮耐受性良好。作者在正常受试者中对奈法唑酮进行了评估,发现其产生的损害比丙咪嗪小,且与酒精相互作用的可能性较小。总之,与TCA相比,奈法唑酮有良好的不良事件特征,与SSRI有相当不同的特征。急性和长期使用后,它似乎都是安全且耐受性良好的。