Giebink G S, Batalden P B, Russ J N, Le C T
Am J Dis Child. 1984 Mar;138(3):287-92. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140410065020.
A randomized clinical trial compared cefaclor and amoxicillin for the treatment of acute otitis media (AOM). Twenty-four (77%) of the 31 examined patients treated with cefaclor and 25 (83%) of the 30 examined patients treated with amoxicillin had resolution of signs and symptoms after completing a ten- to 14-day course of the antibiotic. Patients who had bilateral AOM, serous or mucoid middle ear effusion, Hemophilus influenzae cultured from effusion, or more than five previous otitis media episodes, or who were 3 years of age or younger were more likely to fail treatment. Hemophilus influenzae isolated from effusion were significantly less susceptible to cefaclor than amoxicillin, but none of the 12 treatment failures were caused by antibiotic-resistant infections. Eight (36%) of the 22 patients who recovered after treatment and were reexamined one to three weeks later experienced recurrent AOM. Ear-specific, as well as patient-specific, analyses showed no significant differences between cefaclor and amoxicillin.
一项随机临床试验比较了头孢克洛和阿莫西林治疗急性中耳炎(AOM)的效果。在接受头孢克洛治疗的31例受检患者中,有24例(77%)在完成10至14天的抗生素疗程后体征和症状得到缓解;在接受阿莫西林治疗的30例受检患者中,有25例(83%)同样如此。患有双侧AOM、浆液性或黏液性中耳积液、积液培养出流感嗜血杆菌、既往有超过5次中耳炎发作史,或年龄在3岁及以下的患者治疗失败的可能性更高。从积液中分离出的流感嗜血杆菌对头孢克洛的敏感性明显低于阿莫西林,但12例治疗失败中无一例是由抗生素耐药感染引起的。在治疗后康复且在1至3周后接受复查的22例患者中,有8例(36%)出现复发性AOM。耳部特异性分析以及患者特异性分析均显示,头孢克洛和阿莫西林之间无显著差异。