McLinn S E
Am J Dis Child. 1980 Jun;134(6):560-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1980.02130180018006.
The safety and efficacy of cefaclor were compared with amoxicillin trihydrate in the treatment of 130 cases of otitis media, and with penicillin V potassium in 88 cases of streptococcal pharyngitis in two single-blind controlled studies. Patients with otitis media received approximately 40 mg/kg/day of cefaclor or amoxicillin trihydrate for ten days to three weeks; patients with pharyngitis received 20 mg/kg/day of cefaclor or penicillin V potassium for ten days. Overall, patients who received cefaclor for otitis media had fewer acute failures and better total success, especially in cases caused by Haemophilus influenzae; however, the difference between cefaclor and amoxicillin was not statistically significant. There also was no significant difference between the clinical effectiveness of cefaclor and penicillin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. Cefaclor was well tolerated with no serious side effects.
在两项单盲对照研究中,对头孢克洛与三水合阿莫西林治疗130例中耳炎的安全性和有效性进行了比较,并对头孢克洛与青霉素V钾治疗88例链球菌性咽炎的安全性和有效性进行了比较。中耳炎患者接受约40mg/kg/天的头孢克洛或三水合阿莫西林,疗程为10天至3周;咽炎患者接受20mg/kg/天的头孢克洛或青霉素V钾,疗程为10天。总体而言,接受头孢克洛治疗中耳炎的患者急性治疗失败较少,总有效率更高,尤其是在由流感嗜血杆菌引起的病例中;然而,头孢克洛与阿莫西林之间的差异无统计学意义。头孢克洛与青霉素治疗链球菌性咽炎的临床有效性之间也无显著差异。头孢克洛耐受性良好,无严重副作用。