Achenbach T M, Edelbrock C S
Annu Rev Psychol. 1984;35:227-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.001303.
We considered problems of assessment and taxonomy that have hindered the study of childhood disorders. Many instruments have been developed for assessing children's behavior as seen by parents, teachers, clinicians, trained observers, peers, and children themselves. Multivariate analyses of behavior problems show consistencies in the identification of a few broad-band patterns and more numerous narrow-band syndromes, despite differences in specific items comprising different instruments. Satisfactory reliability has been achieved in many instances, although the variability of children's problem behavior limits agreement among informants who see children under different conditions. Despite their disagreements, however, each informant's perspective may validly contribute to the comprehensive assessment of a child's needs. The quantitative, relativistic, and developmental aspects of children's behavior disorders argue for replacing categorical approaches to assessment and taxonomy with taxometric approaches that capitalize on quantitative methods for identifying and assessing children's behavioral problems and competencies.
我们考虑了那些阻碍儿童疾病研究的评估和分类问题。已经开发出了许多工具,用于评估父母、教师、临床医生、受过训练的观察者、同龄人以及儿童自身所观察到的儿童行为。对行为问题的多变量分析表明,尽管构成不同工具的具体项目存在差异,但在识别一些宽带模式和更多窄带综合征方面具有一致性。在许多情况下都实现了令人满意的可靠性,尽管儿童问题行为的变异性限制了在不同条件下观察儿童的信息提供者之间的一致性。然而,尽管他们存在分歧,但每个信息提供者的观点都可能对全面评估儿童的需求做出有效贡献。儿童行为障碍的定量、相对论和发展方面表明,应采用分类测量方法取代分类评估和分类方法,这种方法利用定量方法来识别和评估儿童的行为问题及能力。