Brown D F, Warner M, Taylor C E, Warren R E
J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jan;37(1):65-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.1.65.
A prototype Malthus Microbiological Growth Analyser was compared with conventional methods for examining blood cultures in a trial of 651 cultures mostly from patients with haematological malignancy or undergoing haemodialysis or renal transplantation. Of 100 significantly positive cultures, organisms from 82 grew in the conventional aerobic (+ CO2) bottle, 78 in the conventional anaerobic bottle and 71 in the Malthus bottle. The differences were not statistically significant (p greater than 0.05). The Malthus system detected 83.6% of significantly positive cultures earlier than the comparable conventional bottles while 7.3% positive cultures were detected earlier by the conventional system. When use of the Malthus system was restricted to the hours of 09.00 to 17.30 daily 27.3% positive cultures were detected earlier by the Malthus system and 16.4% were detected earlier by the conventional system. One of the organisms which grew in the Malthus bottle, a contaminating Staphylococcus epidermidis, was not detected by the Malthus system. Instability of electrodes resulted in 26.9% false positive cultures with the prototype Malthus system. Contamination rates in both the Malthus and conventional anaerobic bottles were lower than in the aerobic bottles.
在一项对651份血培养样本的试验中,将一台马尔萨斯微生物生长分析仪样机与检查血培养的传统方法进行了比较,这些样本大多来自血液系统恶性肿瘤患者、接受血液透析或肾移植的患者。在100份显著阳性培养样本中,82份样本中的微生物在传统需氧(+二氧化碳)瓶中生长,78份在传统厌氧瓶中生长,71份在马尔萨斯瓶中生长。差异无统计学意义(p大于0.05)。马尔萨斯系统比相应的传统培养瓶更早检测到83.6%的显著阳性培养样本,而传统系统更早检测到7.3%的阳性培养样本。当马尔萨斯系统的使用仅限于每天09:00至17:30时,马尔萨斯系统更早检测到27.3%的阳性培养样本,传统系统更早检测到16.4%的阳性培养样本。在马尔萨斯瓶中生长的一种微生物,即污染性表皮葡萄球菌,未被马尔萨斯系统检测到。电极不稳定导致马尔萨斯分析仪样机出现26.9%的假阳性培养结果。马尔萨斯瓶和传统厌氧瓶中的污染率均低于需氧瓶。