Suppr超能文献

诺米芬辛与丙咪嗪治疗门诊抑郁症患者疗效及安全性的多中心双盲比较

Multicenter double-blind comparison of nomifensine and imipramine for efficacy and safety in depressed outpatients.

作者信息

Bremner J D, Abrahams L M, Crupie J E, McCawley A, Proctor R C, Sathananthan G L

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1984 Apr;45(4 Pt 2):56-9.

PMID:6370976
Abstract

Nomifensine, a tetrahydroisoquinoline antidepressant, was compared with imipramine in a 4-week multicenter double-blind study of depressed outpatients (100 on nomifensine, 56 on imipramine). Nomifensine was at least as effective as imipramine in reducing depressive symptoms at average doses of 150 mg/day. When significant differences did occur on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores, they favored nomifensine for improvement in cognitive symptoms and interest in work and activities. Early in treatment, nomifensine patients also showed a better relationship between clinical response and side effects. The proportions of patients experiencing at least one side effect or dropping out due to side effects were almost twice as high in the imipramine group. Dry mouth and sedating effects were 2-3 times more frequent among imipramine patients. Thus, nomifensine demonstrated clinical efficacy at least comparable with imipramine but with indications of a more favorable side effects profile.

摘要

在一项针对门诊抑郁症患者的为期4周的多中心双盲研究中(100名患者服用诺米芬辛,56名患者服用丙咪嗪),对四氢异喹啉类抗抑郁药诺米芬辛与丙咪嗪进行了比较。在平均日剂量为150毫克时,诺米芬辛在减轻抑郁症状方面至少与丙咪嗪一样有效。当汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分出现显著差异时,诺米芬辛在改善认知症状以及对工作和活动的兴趣方面更具优势。在治疗早期,服用诺米芬辛的患者在临床反应和副作用之间也呈现出更好的关系。丙咪嗪组中至少出现一种副作用或因副作用而退出研究的患者比例几乎是诺米芬辛组的两倍。丙咪嗪患者出现口干和镇静作用的频率是诺米芬辛患者的2至3倍。因此,诺米芬辛显示出至少与丙咪嗪相当的临床疗效,且有迹象表明其副作用情况更为良好。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验