Suppr超能文献

汇总12项诺米芬辛研究以评估疗效的可推广性。

Pooling 12 nomifensine studies for efficacy generalizability.

作者信息

Gillings D, Grizzle J, Koch G, Rickels K, Amara I, Donelan M, Hardiman S, Nash R, Sollecito W, Stager W

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1984 Apr;45(4 Pt 2):78-84.

PMID:6370982
Abstract

Twelve parallel group, randomized, double-blind studies of nomifensine's safety and efficacy in the treatment of depressed patients were combined into three pools according to common protocols. This approach permitted evaluation of 1) efficacy results for studies with moderate-sized pools of patients, 2) the degree to which efficacy was generalizable to depressed patients in the general population, and 3) the conditions under which pooled active vs. active (imipramine vs. nomifensine) studies could be regarded as pivotal in support of efficacy. Results showed that nomifensine's superiority over placebo was generalizable to patients with a wide range of characteristics, including age 60 years or older. An appropriate statistical profile of more pronounced nomifensine responders would include patients with a duration of present episode less than 4 months who are acutely depressed, exhibit more severe symptoms, and have been previously hospitalized or treated with other psychotropic medications. A comprehensive assessment and power analysis of the pooled active vs. active studies provided strong evidence for comparability of nomifensine and imipramine.

摘要

12项关于诺米芬辛治疗抑郁症患者安全性和有效性的平行组、随机、双盲研究,根据通用方案合并为3组。这种方法能够评估:1)患者样本量中等的研究的疗效结果;2)疗效在一般人群抑郁症患者中的可推广程度;3)合并的活性药物对比活性药物(丙咪嗪对比诺米芬辛)研究可被视为支持疗效的关键研究的条件。结果显示,诺米芬辛优于安慰剂这一点在具有广泛特征的患者中具有普遍性,包括60岁及以上的患者。对诺米芬辛反应更明显的患者的合适统计学特征包括当前发作持续时间少于4个月、急性抑郁、症状更严重且此前曾住院或接受过其他精神药物治疗的患者。对合并的活性药物对比活性药物研究进行的全面评估和效能分析为诺米芬辛和丙咪嗪的可比性提供了有力证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验