• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安吉尔奇克抗反流假体的腔内侵蚀和移位。

Intraluminal erosion and migration of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.

作者信息

Lilly M P, Slafsky S F, Thompson W R

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1984 Jul;119(7):849-53. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390190087020.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390190087020
PMID:6375635
Abstract

Despite a paucity of published clinical trials, use of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis has increased dramatically since its introduction in 1979. Serious complications of this device have begun to appear. We dealt with two cases of erosion of the prosthesis into the gastrointestinal tract, one of which represents, to our knowledge, the first reported case of a gastroenteric fistula secondary to the device. Other complications of the use of this prosthesis have appeared in the literature. Carefully controlled clinical studies with long-term follow-up are needed to assess the overall benefits and safety of this new antireflux prosthesis.

摘要

尽管已发表的临床试验较少,但自1979年引入Angelchik抗反流假体以来,其使用量急剧增加。该装置的严重并发症已开始出现。我们处理了两例假体侵蚀至胃肠道的病例,据我们所知,其中一例是该装置继发胃肠瘘的首例报道病例。关于该假体使用的其他并发症也已见诸文献。需要进行长期随访的严格对照临床研究,以评估这种新型抗反流假体的总体益处和安全性。

相似文献

1
Intraluminal erosion and migration of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.安吉尔奇克抗反流假体的腔内侵蚀和移位。
Arch Surg. 1984 Jul;119(7):849-53. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390190087020.
2
Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
Ann Intern Med. 1984 Apr;100(4):570-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-100-4-570.
3
[Migration of an Angelchik antireflux prosthesis in the gastrointestinal tract with ileus of the small intestine].
Chirurg. 1986 Dec;57(12):812-4.
4
Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
Am Surg. 1986 Apr;52(4):208-13.
5
Spontaneous penetration of an antireflux prosthesis into the stomach.
Gastrointest Radiol. 1983;8(4):303-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01948139.
6
Intraluminal erosion and retrograde migration of laparoscopic gastric band with high-grade obstruction at gastroesophageal junction.腹腔镜胃束带发生腔内糜烂并向食管胃交界处逆行迁移,伴有高度梗阻。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Mar-Apr;8(2):e14-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.03.290. Epub 2010 Apr 3.
7
Intra-abdominal migration of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
South Med J. 1984 Mar;77(3):384-6. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198403000-00030.
8
Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. A community experience.安吉尔奇克抗反流假体的并发症。一项社区经验。
Am J Surg. 1985 Dec;150(6):735-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90419-2.
9
Complications after use of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
Arch Surg. 1985 Apr;120(4):498-500. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390280084018.
10
Evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis using a model for esophageal reflux in rhesus monkeys.使用恒河猴食管反流模型对安吉尔奇克抗反流假体进行评估。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1986 Feb;41(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62653-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series.食管裂孔闭合术假体加固后的网片并发症:28例病例系列
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1219-26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0205-5. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
2
Complications of PTFE mesh at the diaphragmatic hiatus.聚四氟乙烯网片在膈食管裂孔处的并发症。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 May;12(5):953-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0316-7. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
3
The surgery of complicated gastro-oesophageal reflux.复杂胃食管反流的外科手术
Ir J Med Sci. 1996 Jul-Sep;165(3):193-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02940250.
4
A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis.使用安吉尔奇克假体对结果进行定量评估。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1986 Jan;68(1):55-6.
5
Disappearance of an Anglechik prosthesis.安格利克假体消失。
J R Soc Med. 1988 Aug;81(8):475-6. doi: 10.1177/014107688808100822.
6
Mechanisms of action of antireflux surgery: theory and fact.抗反流手术的作用机制:理论与事实
World J Surg. 1992 Mar-Apr;16(2):320-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02071540.