Suppr超能文献

将Api-10M商业微量稀释系统与试管稀释法和标准微量稀释法进行比较。

A comparison of the Api-10M commercial microdilution system with the tube dilution and standard microdilution methods.

作者信息

Papapetropoulou M, Pappa A, Giamarellou H

出版信息

Infection. 1984 Mar-Apr;12(2):68-71. doi: 10.1007/BF01641673.

Abstract

The susceptibilities of urinary isolates of Escherichia coli (50 strains), Klebsiella pneumoniae (15 strains) and Proteus mirabilis (15 strains) to gentamicin and ampicillin were determined and compared using the following methods: standard tube dilution, standard microdilution, commercial microdilution and disk diffusion susceptibility tests. Results of susceptibility testing performed with the Api- 10M commercial microdilution method agreed with those of the tube dilution method in 93% of the tests, but in only 70% of those obtained with the standard microdilution method; tube dilution and standard microdilution agreed in 85.6% of the cases. All three methods of MIC susceptibility testing agreed with the disk diffusion method in 100% of the tests. There was a definite tendency for the Api- 10M system to give higher MICs than the tube dilution method; the standard microdilution method tended to give lower MICs than those obtained by tube dilution and the commercial microdilution system. The Api- 10M system is a reliable, simple and accurate method since it correlates very will with the tube dilution method.

摘要

采用以下方法测定并比较了50株大肠埃希菌、15株肺炎克雷伯菌和15株奇异变形杆菌尿液分离株对庆大霉素和氨苄西林的敏感性:标准试管稀释法、标准微量稀释法、商业微量稀释法和纸片扩散药敏试验。用Api - 10M商业微量稀释法进行药敏试验的结果与试管稀释法的结果在93%的试验中一致,但与标准微量稀释法得到的结果仅在70%的试验中一致;试管稀释法和标准微量稀释法在85.6%的病例中结果一致。三种最小抑菌浓度(MIC)药敏试验方法与纸片扩散法在100%的试验中结果一致。Api - 10M系统有比试管稀释法给出更高MIC值的明确趋势;标准微量稀释法给出的MIC值往往低于试管稀释法和商业微量稀释系统得到的MIC值。Api - 10M系统是一种可靠、简单且准确的方法,因为它与试管稀释法相关性非常好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验