Barry A L, Jones R N, Gavan T L
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jan;13(1):61-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.1.61.
Micro-Media Systems (MMS) has developed a procedure by which microdilution trays can be filled with dilutions of antimicrobial agents, frozen, and distributed to clinical laboratories. The trays are prepared in various distribution centers throughout the United States to supply clinical laboratories in the vicinity of each center. For use, trays are removed from the freezer, allowed to thaw, and then inoculated with inocula prepared as for any other susceptibility test, using a convenient disposable inoculator (ca. 5 mul per well). A collaborative study was planned to evaluate microdilution trays prepared in three Micro-Media Systems distribution centers. Microdilution minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were compared to standard tube dilution tests (the international collaborative study group method). With gram-positive cocci, the two techniques gave essentially equivalent results. With gram-negative bacilli, the microdilution MICs were generally one doubling dilution lower than the standard tube dilution MICs. Similar results were seen with microdilution trays prepared with a Cooke Dynatech MIC 2000. Inter- and intralaboratory reproducibility with the macro- and microdilution techniques were quite satisfactory, i.e., at least 96% of the end points were within a range of +/-1 log(2) dilution intervals.
微媒体系统公司(MMS)已开发出一种方法,通过该方法可将含有抗菌剂稀释液的微量稀释板进行填充、冷冻,然后分发给临床实验室。这些微量稀释板在美国各地的不同配送中心制备,以供应各中心附近的临床实验室。使用时,将微量稀释板从冰箱中取出,解冻,然后使用方便的一次性接种器(每孔约5微升),如同进行任何其他药敏试验一样接种制备好的接种物。计划开展一项协作研究,以评估在微媒体系统公司的三个配送中心制备的微量稀释板。将微量稀释最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与标准试管稀释试验(国际协作研究组方法)进行比较。对于革兰氏阳性球菌,这两种技术得出的结果基本相同。对于革兰氏阴性杆菌,微量稀释法测得的MIC通常比标准试管稀释法测得的MIC低一个稀释倍数。使用库克·戴纳泰克MIC 2000制备的微量稀释板也得到了类似结果。宏观和微量稀释技术在实验室间和实验室内的重现性相当令人满意,即至少96%的终点在±1个对数(2)稀释区间范围内。