Mochmann H, Kmety E
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1984 May;257(1):73-82.
A deep review of the scientific literature concerning the history of the two oldest icterohaemorrhagiae strains is given in order to promote a decision about the legitimate neotype strain on the genus Leptospira. The strain RGA was found to meet completely the requirements for a Neotype culture given by the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Its origin from a patient with Weil's disease through guinea pig passages in 1915 is well documented and its culture is unequivocally described by Ungermann in 1916. The strain was maintained in pure culture. Since more than 60 years the strain is used for comparative investigations in classification studies in all laboratories performing such tests. At contrary the history of strain Ictero I is very incomplete. The strain was claimed by Yamamoto to be one of the strain isolated by Inada and Ido in 1915 originally designated as Yamasaki. However, the statement the maintenance of these strains because of loss of virulence was discontinued, is repeatedly mentioned in some old publications of the authors. Moreover it is reported that the strain Ictero I because of contamination with a fungus was recultivated after a passage through a splenectomized mouse, i.e. the strain was not maintained in a pure culture. Beside this it is hardly understandable why has the strain not been submitted to other laboratories before 1965. The strain Ictero I was found to contain an additional thermolabile antigen not present in RGA. At present it is impossible to decide whether this property was already present in the original culture or developed only later, eventually after its mouse passage. Summarizing all these facts, it must be stated that the strain Ictero I cannot be considered to meet all the necessary requirements of its recognition as neotype culture of the Genus Leptospira.
对有关两种最古老的黄疸出血群菌株历史的科学文献进行了深入回顾,以便就钩端螺旋体属的合法新模式菌株做出决定。发现RGA菌株完全符合《国际细菌命名法典》规定的新模式培养物的要求。它于1915年通过豚鼠传代从一名韦尔氏病患者分离而来,这一来源有充分的文献记载,1916年Ungermann对其培养进行了明确描述。该菌株一直保持纯培养状态。60多年来,该菌株一直用于所有进行此类测试的实验室的分类研究中的比较调查。相反,黄疸出血群菌株I的历史非常不完整。山本声称该菌株是稻田和伊东于1915年分离的最初命名为山崎的菌株之一。然而,作者的一些旧出版物中多次提到,由于毒力丧失,这些菌株的保存已停止。此外,据报道,黄疸出血群菌株I因被真菌污染,在通过脾切除小鼠传代后进行了再培养,即该菌株没有保持纯培养状态。除此之外,很难理解为什么该菌株在1965年之前没有提交给其他实验室。发现黄疸出血群菌株I含有一种RGA中不存在的额外热不稳定抗原。目前无法确定这种特性在原始培养物中是否已经存在,还是仅在后来,最终在其通过小鼠传代后才出现。总结所有这些事实,必须指出,黄疸出血群菌株I不能被认为符合其作为钩端螺旋体属新模式培养物认可的所有必要要求。