Johnson A J, Spiro S G, Pidgeon J, Bateman S, Clarke S W
Br Med J. 1978 Apr 22;1(6119):1013-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6119.1013.
Out of 62 asthmatic patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of their disease, those whose symptoms had not sufficiently improved 15 minutes after an initial intensive regimen were randomly allocated to receive an intravenous infusion of either salbutamol 10 microgram/min (20 patients) or aminophylline 1 mg/min (19 patients). During the infusions, which lasted 36 hours, peak expiratory flow rates and spirometric values improved in both groups, but differences between the groups did not achieve statistical significance. Although salbutamol may be infused safely for a prolonged period to patients with acute asthma, it has no particular advantage over aminophylline. Furthermore, in patients who respond poorly to initial intensive treatment the subsequent infusion of a bronchodilator may not increase the rate of recovery from the rate that would occur naturally.
在62例因哮喘急性加重而入院的患者中,那些在初始强化治疗方案15分钟后症状仍未充分改善的患者,被随机分配接受静脉输注沙丁胺醇10微克/分钟(20例患者)或氨茶碱1毫克/分钟(19例患者)。在持续36小时的输注过程中,两组的呼气峰值流速和肺量计值均有所改善,但两组之间的差异未达到统计学意义。虽然沙丁胺醇可以安全地长时间输注给急性哮喘患者,但它相对于氨茶碱没有特别的优势。此外,对于初始强化治疗反应不佳的患者,随后输注支气管扩张剂可能不会提高其自然恢复率。