Klastersky J
Clin Haematol. 1984 Oct;13(3):587-98.
The result of the introduction of the new acyl-penicillins and the new cephalosporins has not, so far, been a major breakthrough in the empirical therapy of febrile episodes and infections in granulocytopenic patients. It remains to be seen whether other cephalosporins such as cefoperazone and ceftazidime will perform better in the future. Ceftazidime alone or in combination with aminoglycosides shows very promising early results. My present recommendation for empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients is to use a combination of a penicillin or a cephalosporin active against P. aeruginosa with an aminoglycoside. Special attention should be paid to the emergence of penicillin- and/or cephalosporin-resistant strains. Empirical therapy should be with antibiotics to which resistance is as rare as possible. In this respect, the newer compounds may play a role in the future. It should also be emphasized that clinical information about new drugs is at present based on the study of relatively small groups of patients. Larger studies performed in more homogeneous groups are needed better to define the role of new agents.
到目前为止,新型酰基青霉素和新型头孢菌素的引入在粒细胞减少症患者发热发作和感染的经验性治疗方面尚未取得重大突破。其他头孢菌素如头孢哌酮和头孢他啶未来是否会表现得更好仍有待观察。单独使用头孢他啶或与氨基糖苷类联合使用显示出非常有前景的早期结果。我目前对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者经验性治疗的建议是使用对铜绿假单胞菌有效的青霉素或头孢菌素与氨基糖苷类联合使用。应特别注意耐青霉素和/或头孢菌素菌株的出现。经验性治疗应使用耐药情况尽可能少的抗生素。在这方面,新型化合物未来可能会发挥作用。还应强调的是,目前关于新药的临床信息是基于对相对较小患者群体的研究。需要在更同质的群体中进行更大规模的研究,以更好地确定新药的作用。