Forti I N
Cátedra de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Medicina (B Aires). 1994;54(5 Pt 1):439-58.
During the last 10 years, the emergence and spread of the most important and common resistant pathogens isolated from clinical infections led to the great release of new antibacterial agents. Many of new orally administered antibiotics introduced, such as newer fluoroquinolones or cephalosporins, showed a spectrum of activity and clinical efficacy for the most common clinical community infections. Therefore, therapeutic indication of a new cephalosporin is somewhat difficult to define, because the newer drugs must compete with improved properties over the previous ones. Therefore, choice of a first line antibiotic among apparently therapeutic equivalents could become questionable. The aim of this review was to compile the available data to offer help for a rational choice in confirmed infections of every particular patient condition and context based on microbiological activity, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, safety and cost. Orally administered cephalosporins are beta-lactamic broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents that are often used empirically to treat community bacterial infections and also to treat culture-proven infections due to selected gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms. Cephalosporins differ widely in their spectrum of activity, in vitro antimicrobial potency, microbial resistance, pharmaco-kinetic properties and cost. These differences result from modifications of the cephalosporin molecule. The substitutions on the R1, R2, R3 or R4 side chains results in changes in antimicrobial spectrum, potency, bioavailability, half-life and profile of toxicity. In general, the first-generation agents are more active against gram-positive organisms, more susceptible to B-lactamases of gram-negative producers, shorter serum half-life and lower cost than the other agents. The second-generation cephalosporins present enhanced spectrum of activity due to increased resistance to beta-lactamase enzymes and have longer serum half-life. The third-generation agents are the most active against Entero-bacteriaceae, possess a superior beta-lactamase stability against selected enzymes of multiple resistant bacteria, improved pharmacokinetic properties with extended plasma half-life, that permit once or twice daily administration and are the most expensive compared with the previous drugs. Among these new oral cephems, the addition of an ester group enhances the oral absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and provides better bioavailability as well as antimicrobial activity. The development of bacterial resistance has affected all steps of the cephalosporin mechanism of action. Expertise in the choice and use of the cephalosporins will remain a challenge for the physician, as additional investigational cephalosporins will continue to be developed and introduced into clinical practice in the near future.
在过去10年中,从临床感染中分离出的最重要且最常见的耐药病原体的出现和传播促使大量新型抗菌药物问世。许多新引入的口服抗生素,如新型氟喹诺酮类或头孢菌素类药物,对最常见的社区临床感染展现出了抗菌谱和临床疗效。因此,新型头孢菌素的治疗适应证有些难以界定,因为新药必须在性能上优于旧药才能具备竞争力。所以,在看似治疗等效的药物中选择一线抗生素可能会成为一个问题。本综述的目的是汇总现有数据,以便根据微生物活性、药代动力学特性、临床疗效、安全性和成本,为针对每种特定患者病情和背景的确诊感染做出合理选择提供帮助。口服头孢菌素是β-内酰胺类广谱抗菌药物,常用于经验性治疗社区细菌感染,也用于治疗由特定革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性微生物引起的经培养证实的感染。头孢菌素在抗菌谱、体外抗菌效力、微生物耐药性、药代动力学特性和成本方面存在很大差异。这些差异源于头孢菌素分子的修饰。R1、R2、R3或R4侧链上的取代会导致抗菌谱、效力、生物利用度、半衰期和毒性特征发生变化。一般来说,第一代药物对革兰氏阳性菌更具活性,对革兰氏阴性菌产生的β-内酰胺酶更敏感,血清半衰期较短,成本也低于其他药物。第二代头孢菌素由于对β-内酰胺酶的耐药性增强而具有更广泛的抗菌谱,血清半衰期更长。第三代药物对肠杆菌科细菌最具活性,对多种耐药菌的特定酶具有卓越的β-内酰胺酶稳定性,药代动力学特性得到改善,血浆半衰期延长,允许每日给药一次或两次,且与前几代药物相比最为昂贵。在这些新型口服头孢烯类药物中,可以通过添加酯基来增强胃肠道的口服吸收,并提供更好的生物利用度以及抗菌活性。细菌耐药性的发展影响了头孢菌素作用机制的各个环节。对于医生来说,选择和使用头孢菌素的专业知识仍将是一项挑战,因为在不久的将来,还会有更多的研究性头孢菌素不断被开发并引入临床实践。