Mohing W, Suckert R, Lataste X
Arzneimittelforschung. 1981;31(5a):918-20.
41 patients suffering from moderate to severe pain were included in a multicentric double-blind study comparing 100 mg 4-(p-fluorophenyl)-1-isopropyl-7-methyl-2(1H)-quinazolinone (fluproquazone) to 250 mg mefenamic acid during a three-day period. Both medications produced a clinically highly relevant analgesic effect in the patient population considered. Fluproquazone appears to be significantly more effective than mefenamic acid after the first dose as well as after 6-h period. Fluproquazone was better tolerated than mefenamic acid: one and four patients, respectively, experienced side-effects in the two treatment groups. These results indicate a significantly better therapeutic profile for fluproquazone as compared to mefenamic acid in the management of post-operative pain.
41名中重度疼痛患者被纳入一项多中心双盲研究,该研究在三天时间内将100毫克4-(对氟苯基)-1-异丙基-7-甲基-2(1H)-喹唑啉酮(氟丙喹宗)与250毫克甲芬那酸进行比较。在纳入研究的患者群体中,两种药物均产生了临床上高度相关的镇痛效果。在首剂给药后以及6小时后,氟丙喹宗似乎比甲芬那酸显著更有效。氟丙喹宗的耐受性优于甲芬那酸:两个治疗组分别有1名和4名患者出现副作用。这些结果表明,在术后疼痛管理方面,与甲芬那酸相比,氟丙喹宗具有明显更好的治疗效果。