Grüsser O J
Hum Neurobiol. 1984;3(4):183-90.
Recognition of faces and facial expression is an important component of non-verbal human social behaviour. It is believed to be older phylogenetically than verbal communication in man. Presumably we share basic brain mechanisms of face and mimic recognition with other primates. While palaeoanthropological artifacts indicate the existence of artistic creation in the sculptures and paintings of humans since the upper palaeolithic age (about 30,000 years ago), artistic interest in individual human faces is a rather recent development of mankind, which appeared about 4,500 years ago. Human face and mimic recognition as mimic expression is characterized by some left-right asymmetry, indicating a corresponding discrepancy in the contribution of the left and the right cortical hemisphere to these functions. This opinion is not only supported by data from neuropsychological experiments in normals applying tachistoscopic stimulation to the left or the right visual half-field, but also by the symptoms observed in patients suffering from unilateral cortical lesions. Face and mimic recognition is impaired by left hemisphere or right hemisphere lesions, but for certain aspects a higher contribution is accredited to the right hemisphere by the majority of the investigators. A side bias is also evident in portrait paintings, but this has slowly changed over the last 500 years. The symptom of prosopagnosia, which in rare cases exists in the isolated form, depends not only on the sites of the brain lesion (preferably bilateral, occipitotemporal), but also on the individual training and experience of the patient. Clinical observations as well as the data obtained in microelectrode studies of monkey temporal lobe support the existence of face-specific cortical areas.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
面部识别和面部表情是人类非语言社交行为的重要组成部分。据信,从系统发育角度来看,它比人类的语言交流更为古老。据推测,我们与其他灵长类动物共享面部和模仿识别的基本大脑机制。虽然古人类学文物表明,自旧石器时代晚期(约3万年前)以来,人类的雕塑和绘画中就存在艺术创作,但对人类个体面部的艺术兴趣是人类相当近期才出现的发展,大约出现在4500年前。作为模仿表达的人类面部和模仿识别具有一些左右不对称性,这表明左右皮质半球在这些功能中的贡献存在相应差异。这一观点不仅得到了对正常人进行速视刺激左或右视觉半视野的神经心理学实验数据的支持,也得到了单侧皮质损伤患者所观察到的症状的支持。左半球或右半球损伤都会损害面部和模仿识别,但在某些方面,大多数研究者认为右半球的贡献更大。肖像画中也存在一种偏向,但在过去500年里这种情况已经慢慢改变。面孔失认症这一症状在罕见情况下以孤立形式存在,它不仅取决于脑损伤的部位(最好是双侧枕颞叶),还取决于患者的个体训练和经验。临床观察以及对猴子颞叶进行微电极研究获得的数据都支持存在面部特异性皮质区域。(摘要截取自250词)